-
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently issued the Circular on Further Facilitating Insurance Companies in Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital (Huifa No. 17 [2019], hereinafter referred to as Circular). The official of the SAFE has answered press questions on relevant issues. 1. Could you brief us on the background of the Circular? A: In recent years, the SAFE has been actively serving China's new pattern of all-round opening-up, deepening reform and opening up in foreign exchange, driving the reform of "delegation, administration and service”, and constantly improving the capacity and level of foreign exchange administration to serve the real economy. In March 2015, reform on insurance-related foreign exchange administration was carried out to streamline business application materials and approval procedures, and improve the efficiency of foreign exchange insurance business. With the constant expansion of opening-up and the development of financial marketization, insurance companies have raised new demands for fund facilitation of foreign exchange insurance business. On the basis of fully investigating the demands of market entities and soliciting opinions from various parties, the SAFE has further promoted administration streamlining and power delegation, improved foreign exchange administration of insurance business, made research and issued the Circular. II. What are the main contents of the Circular? A: The Circular adheres to the "principle of actual demand", cancels the approval procedure for settlement of foreign exchange capital of insurance companies, improves the fund use efficiency of insurance companies, clarifies that financial institutions operating foreign exchange business (“financial institutions”) should conduct authenticity examination of business in accordance with the "three principles of business development", and standardizes the management of foreign exchange insurance business. The main contents include: The first is to cancel the approval procedure for settlement of foreign exchange capital of insurance companies and implement the discretionary foreign exchange settlement system. An insurance company may, according to actual operating requirements, handle the settlement of foreign exchange capital and funds raised through overseas IPO with a financial institution so as to improve the fund utilization efficiency of the insurance company. The second is to allow insurance intermediaries to conduct foreign exchange settlement or purchase of indemnities under insurance-related collection and payment for clients. Financial institutions shall examine the authenticity of foreign exchange settlement or purchase. The insurance agencies and insurance brokers that meet the requirements of the competent insurance authorities may directly handle foreign exchange settlement of indemnity funds under the insurance-related collection and payment for clients with a financial institution provided that the recipient of indemnities presents a power of attorney for foreign exchange settlement, so as to improve the payout efficiency with RMB for cross-border insurance-related collection and payment for clients. The third is to improve the ongoing and ex-post regulation of insurance-related foreign exchange business. The business compliance requirements of insurance institutions such as negative issues report shall be refined to ensure the healthy development of foreign exchange insurance business. III. What is the main consideration that allows insurance intermediaries to conduct foreign exchange settlement for indemnity funds under collection and payment for clients? A: With the constant expansion of opening-up and the development of financial marketization, in the efforts of serving the Belt and Road construction, more and more insurance intermediaries, especially insurance agencies and insurance brokers, are going global to serve cross-border insurance business. In the survey of market entities, some insurance intermediaries reflect the problem in RMB payout efficiency of cross-border insurance-related collection and payment service for clients. For example, due to the sudden occurrence of maritime and marine travel business, if the insurance intermediaries are not allowed to conduct exchange settlement of indemnity funds under the insurance-related collection and payment for clients, they will not be able to directly pay RMB to the policyholders, thus affecting the timeliness of relief efforts. The relaxing of the requirement for settlement of indemnity funds under collection and payment for clients by insurance intermediaries can effectively solve this problem and better serve the Belt and Road construction. IV. What contents shall be included in the independent report of negative issues of insurance institutions according to the Circular? A: The Circular adds a new management mode for insurance institutions to actively report negative issues. The reported items of insurance companies include: no foreign exchange insurance business undertaken for two consecutive years after obtaining the license to operate foreign exchange insurance business, being taken over by the insurance regulatory authorities, committing serious violation of laws and regulations and receiving administrative penalties. The reported items of insurance agencies and brokers include having committed serious violations of laws and regulations and having received administrative penalties. Local SAFE branches may require insurance institutions, if needed, to make rectification in order to effectively guard against financial risks. 2019-06-05/en/2019/0605/1522.html
-
The branches and foreign exchange administration departments of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) in all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the branches in Shenzhen, Dalian, Qingdao, Xiamen, and Ningbo, and all designated Chinese-funded foreign exchange banks, In order to facilitate the settlement of cross-border e-commerce, promote the healthy development of foreign exchange business of payment institutions and prevent risks from foreign exchange payment, the SAFE formulated the Measures for the Administration of Foreign Exchange Business of Payment Institutions (“the Measures”, please see the Appendix) based on summarizing the pilot experience of cross-border foreign exchange payment business of payment institutions. Relevant issues are notified as follows: I. Payment institutions that participated in the pilot program on cross-border foreign exchange payment business before the implementation of the Measures shall, within three months from the implementation date of the Measures, conduct directory registration with the branches and foreign exchange administration departments of the SAFE (“the SAFE branches”) at the place of registration in line with the requirements of the Measures. II. Banks may, with reference to Article 12 of the Measures, apply to provide settlement and sales of foreign exchange and relevant fund receipt and payment services to cross-border e-commerce operators and consumers who purchase goods or services by presenting electronic transaction information, provided that the banks meet the requirements on transaction information collection and authenticity verification. III. In order to ensure the smooth transition of pilot business of payment institutions on cross-border foreign exchange payment, each SAFE branch shall accurately convey the policy requirements to the payment institutions within its jurisdiction, make scientific deployment of personnel and properly perform all kinds of work for implementation of the Measures. IV. This Circular shall come into force as of the date of promulgation. In case of any inconsistency between the previous provisions and this Circular, this Circular shall prevail. The Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Implementation of the Pilot Program of Cross-border Foreign Exchange Payment Business through Payment Institutions (Huifa No.7 [2015]) will be abolished. Upon receipt of this Circular, the SAFE branches should immediately forward it to the central sub-branches (sub-branches), local commercial banks, and foreign banks within their respective jurisdiction, and all designated Chinese-funded foreign exchange banks should promptly forward it to their branches. Appendix: Measures for the Administration of Foreign Exchange Business of Payment Institutions State Administration of Foreign Exchange April 29, 2019 2019-04-29/en/2019/0429/1525.html
-
The People's Bank of China, the Ministry of Public Security of the PRC and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange issued the following reminder: Recently, some online platforms have been illegally engaged in foreign exchange margin transactions (also called foreign exchange security deposit, generally referring to such circumstance where customers invest in a certain amount of funds as deposit and conduct foreign exchange transactions within expanded investment amount at a certain leverage multiple), which has severely disrupted the financial order, resulted in property loss of the social public, causing adverse impacts and engendering serious potential risks: I. So far, the People's Bank of China, China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission, China Securities Regulatory Commission as well as the State Administration of Foreign Exchange and its branches haven't approved any institution to engage in foreign exchange margin business either directly or on an agency basis. II. In accordance with the Circular on Sternly Investigating and Punishing Illegal Foreign Exchange Futures Transactions and Foreign Exchange Margin Trading Activities (Zhengjianfazi No. 165 [1994]), any unauthorized transaction of foreign exchange margin by an unapproved institution is illegal; it is also an offence for a client (organization or individual) to entrust an unapproved institution to conduct foreign exchange margin transactions (whether in foreign currency or renminbi as security deposit). III. The public should be fully aware of the risks involved in foreign exchange margin activities, improve risk prevention awareness and ability, and guard against property losses caused by illegal transactions. IV. The general public should actively report to the relevant authorities if they find clues of illegal and criminal activities. 2018-09-14/en/2018/0914/1530.html
-
To implement the spirit of the 19th National Congress of the CPC, further promote the reform of “delegation, administration and service” and drive the healthy development of foreign exchange insurance market, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) recently issued the Circular on Further Facilitating Insurance Companies in Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital (Huifa No. 17 [2019], “the Circular”), in a bid to promote the facilitation of the exchange of insurance-related foreign exchange funds. The Circular mainly contains the following contents. The first is to cancel the approval for settlement of foreign exchange capital of insurance companies and implement the discretionary foreign exchange settlement system. An insurance company may handle the settlement of foreign exchange capital and funds raised through overseas IPO with a financial institution engaging in foreign exchange business (“financial institution”) according to the actual operating requirements. The second is to allow insurance intermediaries to conduct foreign exchange settlement or purchase for indemnities under insurance-related collection and payments for clients. Financial institutions shall examine the authenticity of foreign exchange settlement or purchase. The insurance agencies and insurance brokers that meet the requirements of the competent insurance authorities may directly handle foreign exchange settlement of indemnities under the insurance-related collection and payment for clients with a financial institution provided that the recipient of indemnities presents a power of attorney for foreign exchange settlement. The third is to improve the ongoing and ex-post regulation of foreign exchange insurance business. Business compliance requirements for insurance institutions such as reporting on negative issues shall be refined. The Circular will come into force on July 1, 2019. 2019-06-05/en/2019/0605/1521.html
-
FILE: China’s External Debt from 2001-2014 2016-04-20/en/2016/0420/1529.html
-
List of franchised institutions for domestic and foreign currency exchange for individuals 2021-01-29/en/2019/0719/1534.html
-
RQFIIs(May31,2020) 2020-05-29/en/2019/0719/1533.html
-
QFIIs(May31,2020) 2020-05-29/en/2019/0719/1532.html
-
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) held a press conference on Thursday, July 18, 2019 and answered press questions about the foreign exchange receipts and payments for the first half of 2019. Moderator Liu Fang: Good morning, friends from the media. Welcome to today's press conference on foreign exchange receipts and payments data for the first half of 2019. I’m Liu Fang, deputy director of the General Affairs Department, and I will host today's press conference. It is a great honor today to have Ms. Wang Chunying with us, who is the spokesperson, chief economist and director of Balance of Payments Department of the SAFE. Next, she will brief us on the foreign exchange receipts and payments data for the first half of 2019. 2019-07-18 10:23 Wang Chunying: Good morning, everyone. It’s a great pleasure for me to attend today's press conference. Now I would like to disseminate the information about China's foreign exchange receipts and payments for the first half of 2019 and then I will be taking your questions. 2019-07-18 10:23 Wang Chunying: In the first half of 2019, global economic growth slowed down and factors of instability and uncertainty increased. China's economy continued to operate within a reasonable range, maintained a steady and good momentum of development, and major economic indicators met expectations. The RMB exchange rate against the USD fluctuated in both directions, and the exchange rate expectation was relatively stable. Overall, in the first half of 2019, China's cross-border capital flows remained stable, and supply and demand in the domestic foreign exchange market were basically balanced. 2019-07-18 10:28 Wang Chunying: Banks settled foreign exchange in the amount of RMB 6.03 trillion (equivalent to USD 888.3 billion) and sold foreign exchange in the amount of RMB 6.25 trillion (equivalent to USD 921.6 billion) for the first half of 2019, with a deficit of RMB 224.8 billion (equivalent to USD 33.2 billion). The data on banks' foreign-related receipts and payments for customers show that banks' foreign-related receipts for customers amounted to RMB 11.80 trillion (equivalent to USD 1.74 trillion), and their external payments hit RMB 11.58 trillion (equivalent to USD 1.71 trillion), representing a surplus of RMB 210.8 billion (equivalent to USD 31.2 billion). 2019-07-18 10:29 Wang Chunying: China's foreign exchange receipts and payments present the following characteristics in the first half of the year: First, the deficit of foreign exchange settlement and sales by banks has narrowed, and the overall balance of foreign-related receipts and payments by banks for customers recorded a surplus. In the first half of 2019, banks registered a deficit of USD 33.2 billion in USD terms in foreign exchange settlement and sales, which narrowed by 52% from the average monthly deficit in the second half of 2018; Foreign-related receipts and payments of banks for customers registered a surplus of USD 31.2 billion in the first half of 2019, while the second half of 2018 recorded a deficit. 2019-07-18 10:30 Wang Chunying: Second, the supply and demand of foreign exchange market maintained basic balance. In the first half of this year, although the banks' foreign exchange settlement and sales were in deficit, if other supply and demand factors such as forward exchange settlement and sales as well as option transactions are taken into consideration, the supply and demand in the foreign exchange market were basically balanced. Based on the situations in May and June after the China-US economic and trade frictions were escalated, the foreign exchange settlement and sales of banks recorded an average monthly deficit of USD 6.6 billion, down by 44% from that of the second half of 2018, indicating that the supply and demand situations are satisfactory. The monthly fluctuations are mainly affected by foreign exchange settlement when RMB exchange rate is high and foreign exchange purchase when RMB exchange rate is at low level by market players, reflecting the overall stability of market expectations and the market-based adjustment function of price. 2019-07-18 10:31 Wang Chunying: Third, the foreign exchange sales rate remained stable, and enterprises' domestic foreign exchange loans and cross-border financing increased steadily. In the first half, the foreign exchange sales rate that measures the willingness to buy foreign exchange, or the ratio of foreign exchange purchased by customers from banks to the customer's foreign-related foreign exchange payments was 66.8%, a slight decrease of 0.3 percentage point from the second half of 2018. Meanwhile, the domestic and overseas foreign exchange financing of enterprises increased steadily on the whole. By the end of June 2019, the domestic foreign exchange loan balance of Chinese banks increased slightly by USD 2.9 billion from the end of the previous year, while the balance declined by USD 59.9 billion in the second half of 2018. In the first half of 2019, the balance of cross-border financing in foreign currencies for imports such as overseas payment on behalf of enterprises and usance letter of credit increased by USD 17.2 billion from the end of the previous year, while the balance in the second half of 2018 registered a decline of USD 13.2 billion. 2019-07-18 10:31 Wang Chunying: Fourth, the foreign exchange settlement rate remained basically stable, and market players' willingness to hold foreign exchange declined on the whole. In the first half, the foreign exchange settlement rate that measures the desire to settle foreign exchange, or the foreign exchange sold by customers to banks as a percentage of their foreign-related foreign exchange income, was 64%, a slight decrease of 0.9 percentage point from the second half of 2018. Foreign exchange deposits of enterprises and individuals declined. As of the end of June 2019, the balance of domestic foreign exchange deposits of banks dropped by USD 6.3 billion from the end of 2018. 2019-07-18 10:32 Wang Chunying: Fifth, banks’ forward settlement and sales of foreign exchange posted a big surplus. The contracted forward settlement and sales of foreign exchange of banks with customers registered a surplus of USD 77.7 billion in the first half of this year, but posted a deficit of USD 24.8 billion and USD 3.5 billion respectively in the first half and second half of 2018 respectively. Specifically, the contracted surplus of forward settlement and sales of foreign exchange was USD 34.5 billion and USD 43.2 billion in the first quarter and second quarter of 2019 respectively. 2019-07-18 10:32 Wang Chunying: Sixth, the overall balance of China's foreign exchange reserves rose on the whole. As at the end of June 2019, the balance of China's foreign exchange reserves was USD 3.1192 trillion, up by USD 46.5 billion from the end of 2018. 2019-07-18 10:32 Wang Chunying: These are the major statistical data I want to unveil regarding foreign exchange receipts and payments for the first half. Now I will answer your questions. 2019-07-18 10:33 CCTV News Center: How do you evaluate the situations of cross-border capital flows in China in the first half of this year? There are still many uncertainties in the external environment in the second half of the year. Then, what about the trend of cross-border capital flows in the second half of the year? 2019-07-18 11:08 Wang Chunying: In the first half of this year, despite the complex and volatile external environment, the operation of China's foreign exchange market was smooth on the whole, and cross-border capital flows through major channels showed a positive development trend. There are several comments as follows. First, the supply and demand in the foreign exchange market became more balanced. The main indicators of the foreign exchange market are all relatively stable, and the data I have just reported show this feature as well. For example, the deficit of banks in foreign exchange settlement and sales narrowed compared with that in the second half of 2018, cross-border receipts and payments posted a surplus on the whole, and foreign exchange reserves rose steadily. Second, the balance of payments maintained basic equilibrium. Based on the data we have released, the current account maintained a surplus of USD 49 billion in the first quarter of 2019, accounting for 1.5% of GDP, and the financial account excluding reserve assets registered a surplus of USD 48.8 billon in the first quarter. Third, overseas funds continued to show a net inflow. According to statistics from the Ministry of Commerce, in the first half of this year, China's actual utilization of foreign capital increased by 7% year on year, up by 6.1 percentage points from the same period in 2018. According to the SAFE, the net holdings of domestic bonds and listed stocks by foreign investors increased by USD 49.3 billion from January to June, including USD 41.6 billion in bonds and USD 7.8 billion in stocks. Fourth, outbound investment and profit repatriation of enterprises were stable and orderly. In the first half of this year, China's outbound direct investment increased slightly by 0.1% year on year, according to the statistics of the Ministry of Commerce. According to statistics of the SAFE, the cross-border payments under investment income of enterprises in the first half of this year was basically the same as that in the first half of 2018. Fifth, the foreign exchange settlement and sales for individuals was basically stable. In the first half of the year, the net purchase of foreign exchange by individuals fell by 23% year on year. Therefore, we could give the following overall evaluation of China's foreign exchange market, or the overall evaluation of cross-border capital flows in the first half of this year, i.e., despite the complex and volatile external environment, the operation of China's foreign exchange market remained stable, and the cross-border capital flows through major channels showed a positive development trend. 2019-07-18 11:08 Wang Chunying: It is expected that cross-border capital flows will remain stable in the second half of this year. There are still some uncertainties in the external environment, for example, with respect to the outlook for world economic growth, the World Bank recently lowered its forecast for global economic growth of this year from that of January; and there are unstable and uncertain factors such as global trade protectionism and geopolitical situations. However, in the current internal and external environment, there are still many factors that are conducive to the stability of China's cross-border capital flows. 2019-07-18 11:09 Wang Chunying: First, the international monetary environment is relatively loose. The FED is likely to cut interest rates, while central banks in Europe and Japan are also taking a looser stance on monetary policy. Recently, both developed and developing countries have made some moves to ease their monetary policy. Under such circumstances, the recent stabilization of the USD exchange rate and widening of the interest rate differential between China and the US provide more favorable conditions for the stability of China's foreign exchange market. 2019-07-18 11:10 Wang Chunying: Second, market expectations for the Chinese economy are stable. We observe some facts about the price of credit default swaps, or CDS, on Chinese government debts traded in the international market. The higher the CDS, the higher the market believes the default risk is, and the lower the price, the lower the market thinks the default risk is. Recently, the value is over 40, while it was 60+ at the end of last year, and it approached 150 at the beginning of 2016. Therefore, the current market expectation on the Chinese economy is relatively stable, and the international market is more optimistic about the Chinese economy on the whole. 2019-07-18 11:10 Wang Chunying: Third, the domestic market has become more open. Recently, China has introduced many policies and measures, such as the Foreign Investment Law, revised the negative list for foreign investment access, and issued the new Catalogue of Encouraged Industries for Foreign Investment etc. In addition, China has constantly promoted the liberalization and facilitation of investment and strengthened investment protection. Meanwhile, the capital market has become increasingly internationalized, and the domestic stock market and bond market are included in a broader range of international mainstream index, which reflects the recognition of the Chinese market by international investors. 2019-07-18 11:11 Wang Chunying: Fourth, the two-way fluctuations in the RMB exchange rate have played a role in fostering rational market expectations. Enterprises have become more adaptable to the exchange rate fluctuations, and the settlement and sales of foreign exchange by individuals has become more stable. 2019-07-18 11:12 Wang Chunying: Fifth, the framework for managing cross-border capital flows is increasingly mature. In recent years, we have gained abundant experience in macro-prudential management, and improved our management of overseas investment, onshore guarantees for offshore loans etc. Meanwhile, we have continued to crack down on violations of laws and regulations on foreign exchange, intensified efforts to report typical cases, and effectively maintained the sound order in the foreign exchange market. 2019-07-18 11:12 Wang Chunying: In the second half of this year, there are many factors conducive to the smooth operation of China's cross-border capital flows, both international and domestic. China has adequate internal and external conditions for the smooth operation of cross-border capital flows, and it can better cope with the impact of various external shocks. 2019-07-18 11:12 China News Service: As compared with the previous period, how has the impact and pressure of the recent China-US economic and trade frictions on our cross-border capital flow changed? 2019-07-18 11:29 Wang Chunying: We have been always paying close attention to and monitoring the China-US economic and trade frictions and assessing their impact on China's foreign exchange market, cross-border capital flows and balance of payments. We have compared the situations in May and June this year against that of the second half of 2018. According to the results, the impact of China-US economic and trade frictions on cross-border capital flows in China is controllable on the whole. It’s mainly reflected in the following two aspects: first, the sentiment in China's foreign exchange market and the behavior of market players are more rational and stable. After economic and trade frictions escalated in May this year, the depreciation range and depreciation expectations of the RMB exchange rate against the USD were both lower than that in the second half of last year. On this basis, the adjustment of market players' foreign-related receipts and payments was more stable. Based on the comprehensive situations of May and June, the monthly average deficit of bank's foreign exchange settlement and sales in these two months narrowed by 44% from that in the second half of 2018, and the monthly average deficit of bank's foreign-related receipts and payments for customers was also narrower by 38% than that in the second half of 2018. 2019-07-18 11:30 Wang Chunying: Second, despite the imposition of additional tariffs, China's overall balance of payments situation remains stable and controllable. From the second half of last year till now, the United States have gradually escalated measures to impose additional tariffs to China’s exports. However, China's balance of payments has remained stable on the whole. As we mentioned just now, the current account posted a surplus of USD 49 billion in the first quarter, while the average quarterly surplus of the second half last year was USD 38.9 billon. We could see that the surplus under the current account of the first quarter this year is much higher than the average quarterly surplus of the second half of last year. In the first quarter, the financial account excluding reserve assets registered a surplus of USD 48.8 billon. Direct investment, portfolio investment and other investments all recorded a surplus. The surplus of the financial account excluding reserve assets in the third quarter last year reached USD 14 billion, while the fourth quarter of last year registered a slight deficit of USD 12.3 billion. We also observed the behavior of micro players. From the perspective of micro players, first, the direct investment of the US enterprises in China has remained steady, indicating the close economic and trade ties between China and the United States. According to the statistics of the Ministry of Commerce, the direct investment of the United States in China in the first five months of this year was up by 4% from the same period last year. A recent survey by the American Chamber of Commerce in Shanghai found that more than 80 percent of the US enterprises are optimistic about their prospects in China in the next five years. Second, Chinese enterprises have actively responded to the impact of the additional tariffs and sought to diversify their exports. According to customs statistics, China's exports to Non-US countries accounted for 83% of total exports in the first six months of this year, up by 1.5 percentage points year on year. 2019-07-18 11:31 Wang Chunying: In general, China's foreign exchange market sentiment has become more stable against the backdrop of China-US economic and trade frictions. Meanwhile, China has continued to make innovation and improve macro control, attach importance to pre-emptive adjustment and fine-tuning of policies and measures, constantly deepen reform and open wider to the outside world. Domestic enterprises and other market players are also actively responding to relevant changes. In addition, the exchanges between Chinese and the US enterprises are still very active, and this close economic and trade exchanges are playing a positive role. All these show that we are confident to cope with the changing situations and maintain the stability of China's cross-border financial flows. 2019-07-18 11:32 Economic Daily: The current account continued to register a surplus in the first quarter of 2019. What are the main sources of the surplus? Could you brief us on situations of the second quarter? How do you view the future trend? 2019-07-18 11:33 Wang Chunying: China has maintained a surplus under the current account this year. As mentioned several times just now, the current account recorded a surplus of USD 49 billion in the first quarter of this year, or 1.5% of GDP, while the same period last year registered a slight deficit. For the main sources of the surplus under the current account in the first quarter, we can observe the changes in several major items. First, the surplus of trade in goods increased rapidly. In the first quarter, the surplus of trade in goods as recorded by balance of payments was USD 94.7 billion, up by 83% year on year. Second, the deficit of trade in services narrowed. In the first quarter, the deficit of trade in services was USD 63.4 billion, down by 14% year on year, of which, the deficit in tourism was USD 57.6 billion, down by 9%. Third, the primary income registered a surplus of USD 15.6 billion, mainly due to the surplus of investment income. Specifically, income of China's various outbound investments, such as profits, interests and dividends, totaled USD 62.9 billion, up by 31% year on year. We preliminarily estimate that the current account will remain in surplus in the second quarter. We publish the balance-of-payments figures on the SAFE’s official website for trade in goods and services on a monthly basis, and these two items can basically reflect the general situations of the current account. According to the data released by us in April and May, the surplus under the trade in goods totaled USD 70.7 billion, up by 30% year on year. The trade in services registered a deficit of USD 46.2 billion, down by 11% from a year earlier, including a 9% decline in the deficit in tourism, roughly the same as that in the first quarter. According to our preliminary judgment based on these data, the current account in the balance of payments remained in surplus in the second quarter of this year. 2019-07-18 11:33 Wang Chunying: The current account is expected to remain within a reasonable range for the whole year, and a small surplus is likely to continue. First of all, it should be noted that a small surplus or deficit under the current account is considered to be within a reasonable range of basic equilibrium. In the medium and long term, China's current account still has the basis and conditions to maintain a reasonable level. There are several supporting factors. First, the added value of China's manufacturing industry ranks the first in the world. Since the founding of the New China 70 years ago, especially since the reform and opening up 40 years ago, China has gradually formed a complete and independent industrial system. Moreover, the added value of high-tech manufacturing industry has been constantly increasing as a percentage of the total added value, up by 1.2 percentage points in 2018 from the 2017 level to reach 14%. It indicates that China's manufacturing transformation and upgrade is making steady progress, which is conducive to enhancing the competitiveness of export products. Second, China's position in the global industrial chain is relatively stable. Domestic industrial chain is very complete from upstream to downstream, the supporting facilities are adequate, skilled workers are sufficient, labor productivity has continued to improve, and the comparative advantage is still relatively strong. Third, although China's savings rate has fallen, it is still among the highest in major economies of the world. A high savings rate is conducive to maintaining a basically balanced current account. In addition, the current deficit under the trade in services has narrowed and investment income has improved, providing more support for maintaining the surplus under the current account this year. 2019-07-18 11:34 CBN Daily: What would you say about the external debt situation in China? In recent years, China's external debt has continued to increase, is there any risk? 2019-07-18 11:57 Wang Chunying: People are also concerned about the issue of external debt. First of all, we’d like to exchange with you our views on external debt from a broader perspective, and observe China's external claims and external debt in the meantime. 2019-07-18 11:57 Wang Chunying: With the increasingly close ties between China's economy and the global economy, the overall rise of external debt and external claims is a normal development process. Based on the data of international investment position in recent years, by the end of the first quarter of 2019, the balance of all China's external financial liabilities had increased by 12% from the end of 2014, among which the balance of full-scale external debt had increased by 11%. In the same period, the balance of external financial assets increased by 15%, indicating that China's economy is more deeply integrated into the global economy and the scale of cross-border investment and financing has been steadily increased. Overall, China continues to post net external assets, with the balance of net assets at the end of the first quarter up by 22% from the end of 2014. 2019-07-18 11:57 Wang Chunying: In terms of the external debt itself, the structure of China's external debt has been further optimized and become more stable. I'd like to share our observations from two perspectives. From the perspective of the term structure, at the end of the first quarter of 2019, the outstanding medium and long-term external debt increased by 49% from the end of 2014, accounting for 36% of the total external debt, up by 9 percentage points from the end of 2014. Over the same period, the outstanding short-term external debt fell by 4%. From the perspective of debt instruments, at the end of the first quarter, the outstanding debt securities tripled that at the end of 2014, accounting for 23%, and increased by 15 percentage points compared with that at the end of 2014. This reflects the need of overseas investors to diversify their asset allocation and the demand of overseas central bank institutions to increase their holdings of RMB reserve assets. According to recent data released by the International Monetary Fund, RMB assets accounted for 1.95% of foreign exchange reserves held by central banks of various countries at the end of the first quarter of 2019, the highest level since the release of RMB reserve assets data in 2016. At present, the proportion of holdings by overseas investors in the domestic bond and stock markets is relatively low, only about 2% or 3%. It will increase in the future, and the stability of debt securities will remain relatively high. Moreover, according to historical experience, there was a small increase in debt securities in 2015 when the external debt fell back. 2019-07-18 11:58 Wang Chunying: From the perspective of the main safety indicators of external debt, China's external debt risk is generally controllable. For example, the external debt ratio, i.e., the ratio of the outstanding external debt to GDP, was 14.4% at the end of 2018 in China, while the internationally accepted safe level was 20%. The debt ratio, i.e., the ratio of the outstanding external debt to the export income of goods and services in the balance of payments, is 74.1% in China while the internationally accepted safe level is 100%. The debt servicing ratio, which refers to the ratio of the total medium- and long-term external debt servicing amount to the export income of goods and services in the balance of payments, is 5.5% in China, while the internationally accepted safe level is 20%. Another indicator is the ratio of short-term external debt to foreign exchange reserves. This ratio is 41.4% in China while the internationally accepted safe level is 100%. Based on these safety indicators, China's current external debt indicators are all within the internationally accepted safe range, and these indicators are all lower than the overall level of developed countries and emerging market countries. 2019-07-18 12:00 China Securities Journal: At the G20 Osaka Summit, President Xi announced the important measures to further open up China to the outside world. In the second half of the year, what new ideas and measures will the SAFE introduce with respect to the foreign exchange administration reform and opening up? 2019-07-18 12:05 Wang Chunying: At the G20 Summit, President Xi proposed to move faster to open up to the outside world and strive to achieve high-quality development. The SAFE will earnestly implement the spirit of President Xi’s speech and adhere to two basic considerations in relevant work: The first is to deepen the reform of foreign exchange administration, promote the two-way opening up of financial markets and serve the new pattern of comprehensive opening up in China. The second is to maintain the stability of the foreign exchange market, guard against the risk of cross-border capital flows, safeguard the security, liquidity, value preservation and appreciation of foreign exchange reserves, and safeguard the national economic and financial security. Specifically, there are several major relevant measures. First, efforts will be made to further promote the liberalization and facilitation of cross-border trade and investment. Firstly, foreign exchange administration policies will be optimized and innovation in trade patterns will be given further support. Secondly, efforts will be made to further facilitate foreign-invested enterprises to transfer funds, and support qualified and capable Chinese enterprises to make authentic and compliant outbound investments. Thirdly, active support will be given to pilot free trade zones, the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Great Bay Area and the XiongAn New Area for taking the lead in pilot implementation of foreign exchange administration reform, and efforts will be made to support Hainan in comprehensively deepening reform and opening up. 2019-07-18 12:05 Wang Chunying: Second, the opening up of capital accounts will be steadily promoted. We will take into account the requirements of economic development stage, financial market conditions and financial stability in a holistic manner, and coordinate transactions and remittance. With a focus on two-way opening up the financial market, we will promote the opening of non-convertible items in an orderly manner and improve the facilitation of convertible items. This is the basic principle and consideration for steadily promoting the opening up of capital account. There are special arrangements in several aspects. The first is to reform the QFII and RQFII, expand the scope of investment, and study ways to appropriately relax or even cancel the QFII quota management. The second is to support the healthy development of science and technology innovation board, and do a good job in cross-border fund management of depositary receipts under the Shanghai-London Stock Connect. The third is to promote the integration of open channels in the inter-bank bond market. 2019-07-18 12:06 Wang Chunying: Third, we need to improve the management framework of cross-border capital flows that combines macro-prudential management and micro-regulation. In terms of macro-prudential management, efforts will be made to improve the monitoring, early warning and response mechanisms for cross-border capital flows, enrich the policy toolbox for macro-prudential management of cross-border capital flows, and counter-cyclically regulate pro-cyclical fluctuations in the foreign exchange market in an open, transparent and market-based manner. With respect to micro regulation, we will continue to maintain the stability, consistency and predictability of regulatory policies across the cycle, crack down upon illegal and irregular activities in foreign exchange, and maintain a healthy and sound order in the foreign exchange market. 2019-07-18 12:06 Wang Chunying: Next, based on the thematic education activities on "remaining true to our original aspiration and keeping our mission firmly in mind" and under the guidance of Xi Jinping Thought on Socialism with Chinese Characteristics for a New Era, the SAFE will further conduct surveys at the grassroots level and closely investigate the market to find out the actual situations and come out with practical measures, guarantee the implementation, unswervingly deepen the reforms in the foreign exchange field, and further open the foreign exchange market and serve the development of the real economy. Meanwhile, we will actively guard against risks from cross-border capital flows, maintain the healthy and sound order of the foreign exchange market as well as national economic and financial security. 2019-07-18 12:07 Moderator Liu Fang: This is the end of today's press conference. Thank you very much for your understanding of and support to our foreign exchange administration work, especially our press work all this time. Thank you. 2019-07-18 12:07 (The original text is available at www.people.com.cn) 2019-07-18/en/2019/0718/1538.html
-
Pan Gongsheng, PBC Deputy Governor and SAFE Administrator Since 1994, especially since July 2005, China has been continuously pushing ahead with the reform of the RMB exchange rate formation mechanism. As a result, the RMB exchange rate has seen its formation and adjustment more and more marketized and its flexibility increasing. At the same time, financial institutions and market participants have become better adapted to RMB exchange rate fluctuations and adjustments, with risk hedging tools more diversified and RMB internationalization making constant progress. Although the US recently designated China as a so-called “currency manipulator”, the continuity and stability of China’s foreign exchange management policies will not be affected. Financial reform will continue to go deeper and financial opening-up will be further expanded. We will follow unswervingly, as always, the path of development with Chinese characteristics. I. The US designation of China as a so-called “currency manipulator”, essentially a political maneuver amid protectionism and unilateralism, will be remembered as a typical case of absurdity in international financial history. On August 5, in violation of common sense and professionalism in world trade and international finance, the US Treasury designated China as a “currency manipulator” for not intervening in Chinese currency devaluation. This move, in total disregard of the fact that the unilateral US tariff hikes prompted by protectionism had caused adjustment across the board on international financial markets, was also inconsistent with the conclusion of the Report on Macroeconomic and Foreign Exchange Policies of Major Trading Partners of the United States released by the US Treasury this May. It was part of the overall US strategy to trigger and escalate China-US trade frictions, fully demonstrating the lack of transparency and the arbitrariness of US policy assessment as well as the possibility that any price adjustment unwelcomed by the White House on international markets will be willfully attached a political tag of foreign government intervention. Former US Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers wrote recently that China does not fit the template for a “currency manipulator”, and that the move of the US Treasury labeling China a “currency manipulator” and asking the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to intervene was unjustified, which would surely do grave damage to the credibility of the US government and Treasury. In the newly released report on the annual Article IV consultation with China, the IMF stood by the basic judgement it had held since 2015, reiterating that the RMB exchange rate was broadly in line with China’s economic fundamentals, which is ample proof that the US accusation is groundless and untenable. The short-term adjustments lately seen in the RMB exchange rate were spontaneous reactions of financial markets to the surprise US announcements of unexpected tariffs. Since April 2018, the US has triggered and kept escalating trade frictions with China, which have become the primary influence on short-term movements of the RMB exchange rate. On June 15, 2018, while China-US trade talks were making headway, the US announced abruptly tariff hikes on USD50 billion worth of imports from China, and three days later threatened to impose higher tariffs on an additional USD200 billion of Chinese imports, sending the RMB into dramatic adjustment against the US dollar, with the onshore CNY/USD spot rate posting a monthly fall of 3.4 percent. In December 2018, as trade tensions eased after Chinese and US leaders met during the G20 summit, the RMB resumed the upward trend. In May 2019, however, the US once again raised tariffs unexpectedly on Chinese goods, bringing down the onshore CNY/USD spot rate by 2.4 percent for the month. On August 2, the US further threatened to increase tariffs on the remaining USD300 billion of Chinese goods, leading to sharp fluctuations in the RMB exchange rate. After the start of trading on August 5, the offshore and onshore RMB weakened beyond 7 per US dollar successively. For the two trading days of August 2 and August 5, the onshore CNY/USD spot rate fell by 1.9 percent approximately. All these fluctuations, as we can see, were natural market responses to external impact on the RMB. II. The politicalized and capricious policies of unilateralism and protectionism of the US will be dark clouds over global financial markets. Since 2018, US protectionist measures on trade have triggered severe turmoil in the global financial market, leading to sharp fluctuations and rapid contagion not only in stock market and foreign exchange market, but also in prices of large-category assets. After the US imposed additional 10 percent tariffs on China’s USD200 billion imports in September 2018, the global stock market (MSCI Global Index) plummeted, with the biggest drop of 18.0 percent. After the US twice escalated tariff measures against China in May and August 2019, the biggest falls in the global stock market reached 6.3 percent and 4.4 percent respectively. Gold price has appreciated by 17.0 percent since May 2019, once exceeding USD 1,500 per ounce, which also revealed a sharp rise of global risk aversion. Since April 2018, the most significant weakening of the exchange rates of emerging market currencies recorded 14.8 percent. It’s evident that the unilateralism and capriciousness of the US policies is a major source of the highly intensified shocks in the financial market. Just as Mr. Larry Summers, former US Treasury Secretary, noted that “there is significant risk of a recession since the financial crisis in 2008”. The monetary policy of the FED is critical to the stability of the global financial markets. Nevertheless, the US government continuously imposes pressures on the Fed, seriously threatening the independence and professionalism of its monetary policy. Donald Trump changed the tradition that successive U.S. presidents did not comment publicly on monetary policy, repeatedly expressing dissatisfaction with the Fed’s monetary policy and a strong dollar and even openly threatening to fire current Chairman Jerome Powell, and attempted to influence FED’s decision by nominating new board members. As the 2020 US presidential election approaches, the frequency of Trump’s public comments on the Fed and the USD exchange rate has been on the rise. Since June 2018, he has lashed out at Fed’s policies or the USD exchange rate more than 30 times. In particular, after RMB weakened beyond 7 per US dollar in early August, aside from designating China as a currency manipulator, Trump denounced Fed for its non-action, and demanded for a cut by 100 basis points as soon as possible, implicitly pointing to the issue of USD exchange rate. Recently, four former chairs of Fed have released a joint declaration, stating that although it often occurred that politicians called for looser monetary policies around elections, monetary policies based on current political (rather than economic) needs would lead to worse economic performance in the long run, which could undermine public confidence of the central bank and result in unstable financial markets. They have called for maintaining Fed’s independence, and keeping monetary-policy decisions from short-term political pressures. III. The PBC will further enhance the flexibility of RMB exchange rate in the market oriented reform, and the foreign exchange market will gradually return to the fundamentals after absorbing short-term shocks. Although the RMB exchange rate was hit by trade frictions and the US designated China as a currency manipulator, our established policies of comprehensively deepening reforms and further opening up will not waver. We will continue to implement the managed floating exchange rate regime based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies, persistently push forward market oriented exchange rate reform, and improve the RMB exchange rate formation mechanism, so as to keep the exchange rate basically stable at a reasonable and equilibrium level. As a responsible big country, China adopted a responsible attitude during the Asian financial crisis and global financial crisis, and made significant contributions to the gradual post-crisis recovery of the world economy. We will remain firmly committed to the previous G20 summits’ commitments including non-adoption of competitive devaluation and no use of the exchange rate as a tool to cope with international trade disputes. The resilience and potential of the Chinese economy provide a solid base for the stability of RMB exchange rate. Despite that the RMB exchange rate will be subject to trade frictions and other external shocks, we judge it will not depreciate in disorder, and the foreign exchange market will eventually return to fundamentals after a brief shock. Firstly, economic performance has been stable and is expected to firm going forward. The fundamentals for sound economic growth over the long term remain unchanged as economic growth is expected to outpace most major economies and the RMB remains a strong currency. According to Bank for International Settlements, from 2005 to June 2019, RMB appreciated by 38 percent in tems of nominal effective exchange rate, and 47 percent in terms of real effective exchange rate, topping all other G20 countries. Though there have been huge uncertainties in recent China-US trade frictions, the marginal effect of US tariffs on China has been declining. Since the beginning of 2019, with favorable fundamentals, the Chinese economy has on the whole maintained stability while making steady progress, and the major macroeconomic indicators have performed within a reasonable range. Achievements have been made in economic structural adjustments, with growth resilience enhanced and macro leverage ratio remaining basically stable. Secondly, cross-border capital flows are generally stable. As China gradually expanded areas of opening up and comprehensively implemented the management model of pre-establishment national treatment plus a negative list, the domestic business environment has been further improved and foreign direct investment still enjoys great development potential. In recent years, China has continuously promoted high-level opening up of the financial market, and created a favorable policy environment for foreign investors, including those from the US, to allocate more resources to RMB assets. So far, the sizes of Chinese bond market and stock market have been ranking high in the world, but only around 2 percent and 3 percent of the financial assets were held by foreign investors. With Chinese bond market and stock market more widely included in major international indices, given the relatively high yield in the Chinese bond market against the expansion of negative interest rates worldwide, there is still great potential for foreign investment. Thirdly, China’s external debt has been more stable. In recent years, China’s external debt growth is not high compared with its economic size. By end-2018, China’s external debt ratio (outstanding external debts/GDP), debt ratio (outstanding external debts/annual export proceeds in foreign exchange) and debt servicing ratio (external debt principal and interest repayment/annual export proceeds in foreign exchange) stood at 14.4 percent, 74.1 percent and 5.5 percent respectively, far lower than the internationally accepted alarm level. The structure of external debt continued to optimize, as foreign central bank investors continued to increase their holdings of Chinese bonds for medium- to long-term asset allocation. As a result, the proportion of debt securities in outstanding external debt increased continuously from 8 percent at end-2014 to 22 percent at end-2018. Such kind of capital is relatively stable, hence unlikely to be “deleveraged” in times of exchange rate changes. Fourthly, the RMB exchange rate showed more two-way fluctuations, and foreign exchange market entities became more adaptive and rational. Since the “8.11” exchange rate reform, the RMB exchange rate has been more flexible, with its fluctuation ratio approaching that of currencies of major developed economies. The two-way fluctuations of the RMB exchange rate have become regular, and the depreciation pressure has been timely released. At present, individual foreign currency purchases have been more stable, outbound direct investment by enterprises has been more reasonable and orderly, foreign currency stockpiling has been gradually disappearing, and enterprises’ awareness of exchange rate risk management has been further enhanced. IV. The PBC will maintain the continuity and stability of foreign exchange administrative policies, continuously enhance the liberalization and facilitation of cross-border trade and investment, and improve the cross-border capital flow management framework for opening-up at a higher level. The foreign exchange authorities will maintain policy continuity and stability to serve the new pattern of China’s comprehensive opening-up. We will implement the decisions and arrangements of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, and fulfill our responsibilities by seizing the long-term trend while respecting market forces. We will firmly adhere to our commitments to reform and ensure supply of foreign currencies to enterprises and individuals with regular demands, thus supporting import and export, profit distribution, two-way cross-border investment and other production and operation activities of enterprises, as well as meeting individuals’ actual demands of travelling and studying abroad. Current account payments arising from our people’s real needs will remain unaffected. In addition, we will continue to vigorously promote the liberalization and facilitation of cross-border trade and investment, and further carry out pilot facilitation reforms including trade receipt and payment facilitation, electronization of tax filing for trade in services, and delegation of external debt cancellation to banks, with a view to better serve the real economy. We will continue to deepen the reform of “streamlining administration, delegating powers, strengthening regulation and improving services”, optimize the online system of “Internet Plus government services” released by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) in June, and foster a more open, fair and convenient business environment. We firmly believe that in the future, China’s foreign exchange administration will adapt to the opening-up in a more open environment; capital account opening-up, two-way opening-up of the financial market and the RMB internationalization will be promoted in a coordinated way at a higher level; and the liberalization and facilitation of cross-border trade and investment will be further advanced. We have the confidence and capability to effectively prevent risks arising out of external shocks, maintain stability of the foreign exchange market, and promote stable and sound development of the financial market and the financial system. (Source: China Financial News) 2019-08-12/en/2019/0812/1545.html