-
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently issued the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Advancing Foreign Exchange Administration Reform to Enhance Authenticity and Compliance Reviews (Huifa No. 3 [2017]) (hereinafter referred to as Circular). The official of the SAFE has answered press questions on relevant issues. I. What are the background and logic behind introducing the Circular? A: For a long time, the SAFE has closely followed the work plans of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, with a focus on accelerating administration streamlining and power delegation, transforming government functions, breaking new grounds in the reform, reducing institutional transaction costs and promoting trade and investment facilitation. Meanwhile, it has been committed to monitoring and early warning of cross-border capital flows, imposing stringent requirements on authenticity and compliance reviews, maintaining a tough stance on foreign exchange irregularities, and safeguarding the healthy and orderly foreign exchange markets to serve the development of the real economy. The Circular will continue with this logic: first, efforts will be made to systematically advance the reform in key areas, especially the liberalization of the domestic foreign exchange markets, in a bid to promote trade and investment facilitation; second, the capital flow management system will be built and refined under the macro-prudential management framework. Banks and enterprises will be required to observe the existing provisions on foreign exchange administration and make sure transactions are authentic and comply with relevant regulations. The bottom line against risks must be adhered to under the overall principle of reform and opening up to safeguard the order of the foreign exchange markets and guard against cross-border capital flow risks. The cross-border receipts, payments and exchanges that have authentic backgrounds and comply with relevant regulations will not be affected. II. How will the market benefit from foreign exchange settlements for domestic foreign exchange loans for exports under trade in goods? What attention should be paid? A: Allowing foreign exchange settlements for domestic foreign exchange loans for exports under trade in goods on the premise of controllable risks will be favorable for addressing difficult and costly financing facing some small and medium-sized importers and exporters and for the development of the real economy. Foreign exchange funds that could be settled include outward documentary bills and export bill discounts under L/C and collection, export commercial invoice discounts, export factoring, forfeiting, order financing, agreed financing, overseas agency payments for exports, packing loans and other domestic foreign exchange loans for exports under trade in goods. To avoid currency mismatches between enterprises and banks, and reduce the impact on the monetary policy from foreign exchange settlements of domestic foreign exchange loans, domestic institutions will be required to use foreign exchange proceeds from exports of goods to repay the domestic foreign exchange loans under which foreign exchange has been settled into RMB. In principle, they are not allowed to make payments through buying foreign exchange, in order to maintain an equilibrium between aggregate supply and demand in the foreign exchange markets. III. What are the major considerations for allowing funds for overseas loans under domestic guarantees to be transferred back for domestic use? A: Since the macro-prudential management policy for full-scale cross-border financing was implemented in 2016, Chinese enterprises have been allowed to borrow external debt in proportion to their net assets. Allowing funds for overseas loans under domestic guarantees to be transferred back as external debt for domestic use under the macro-prudential management framework will be favorable for facilitating cross-border investment and financing by enterprises and enable them to ease the difficulties to raise funds, reduce the heavy cost of financing and serve the real economy by using the resources of both domestic and foreign markets. In practice, the enterprises should simply handle the external debt registration in accordance with the existing regulations on external debt management. Moreover, funds for overseas loans under domestic guarantees could also be transferred back for domestic use through equity participation according to relevant regulations. IV. What new progress has been achieved in supporting centralized operation and management of foreign exchange of multinationals? A: According to the Regulations on the Centralized Operation and Management of the Foreign Exchange Funds of MNCs (Huifa No. 36 [2015]) issued in 2015, "the deposits attracted by domestic banks through the international foreign exchange master account can be used in China within 50% of the balance of the daily average deposits for the previous six months; over 50% of the deposits attracted through the international foreign exchange master account can be used domestically provided that the quota for outstanding short-term external debt have been used." In practice, the models and paths of domestic use of deposits are based on banks' own operations. The adjustment of the proportion of 50% into 100% this time and the provision that funds for domestic use are not included in the quota for outstanding short-term external debt of banks are for the purposes of motivating banks' initiatives to optimize the functions of the international foreign exchange master account and diversify the channels to use funds. V. What are the major considerations for allowing overseas institutions in pilot free trade zones to go through the procedures of foreign exchange settlements through the non-resident account? A: Building pilot free trade zones is a significant move adopted by the CPC Central Committee and the State Council to deepen reform and opening up under new circumstances. The SAFE has been active in supporting and implementing the measure. According to the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Management of Non-resident Accounts of Overseas Institutions (Huifa No. 29 [2009]), without approval from the SAFE branch and foreign exchange administration department in places of registration, overseas institutions are forbidden from going through foreign exchange settlements of funds in their non-resident accounts directly or in disguise. To seek the experience in monitoring offshore accounts and make further use of the pilot free trade zones in deepening reform and opening up, the Circular allows settlements of foreign exchange funds in the non-resident account (NRA) opened with the banks in the pilot free trade zones. Where the funds are remitted for domestic use after the foreign exchange settlement, the valid commercial documents and vouchers of domestic institutions and individuals concerned will first be reviewed in accordance with the regulations with regard to cross-border transactions and the balance of payments declaration will be made as required. Moreover, the SAFE made clear in 2015 that overseas institutions could engage in spot foreign exchange settlement and sales in accordance with relevant regulations, and the banks registered in the pilot free trade zones could handle RMB and foreign exchange derivatives transactions for them, while allowing foreign exchange settlements in the non-resident account of an overseas institution in the free trade zones could boost the above innovative measures to play their roles. VI. Why does the Circular stress again that "enterprises shall go through the procedures of foreign exchange receipts and payments under trade in the principle that 'whoever exports shall receive foreign exchange, and whoever imports shall make payments", and are required to undergo the procedures for foreign exchange receipts in time? A: In accordance with Article 14 of the Guidance on Foreign Exchange Administration under Trade in Goods and Article 2 of the Detailed Rules on the Implementation of the Guidance on Foreign Exchange Administration under Trade in Goods, enterprises shall go through the procedures of foreign exchange receipts and payments under trade in the principle that 'whoever exports shall receive foreign exchange, and whoever imports shall make payments", and collect payments on time and in full as agreed upon in the contracts in export business. In the case of foreign trade agency, the agent shall be responsible for foreign exchange receipts and payments. Where the entity that handles foreign exchange receipts and payments in line with regulations is inconsistent with the importer/exporter, the subject alteration procedures shall be gone through with the local foreign exchange authority. Recently, the SAFE has found from its monitoring and verification that a few enterprises do not collect foreign exchange or collect less foreign exchange than they should, and the foreign trade declarer is inconsistent with the subject engaged in foreign exchange receipts and payments, which have interrupted the order of foreign exchange receipts and payments. Given this, the Circular reiterates the above requirements, warns risks and stresses foreign exchange business should be authentic and comply with regulations, in a bid to further regulate the order in the foreign exchange markets and serve the sustained and healthy economic development. VII. Why are domestic institutions required to report information on the overseas deposits of the foreign exchange receipts under the current account? A: According to the Circular of the SAFE on Printing and Distributing the Regulations on Foreign Exchange Administration for Trade in Goods (Huifa No. 38 [2012]), and the Circular of the SAFE on Printing and Distributing the Regulations on Foreign Exchange Administration for Trade in Services (Huifa No. 30 [2013]), domestic institutions are required to go through the opening registration or verification procedures for the overseas foreign exchange account with the foreign exchange authority in advance if they want to deposit overseas the foreign exchange receipts generated by trade in goods and trade in services, and timely report the information on the receipts and payments in the overseas foreign exchange account for the foreign exchange authority to conduct off-site monitoring. But the monitoring and verification revealed that individual institutions have failed to go through relevant registration and filing procedures or report information as required for various reasons. To understand and obtain the information on foreign exchange receipts under the current account, collect the data on foreign exchange receipts deposited overseas, standardize data reporting, and refine the management of foreign exchange receipts deposited overseas, the Circular requires that any domestic institution who fails to timely report their overseas accounts and the receipts and payments in the account should actively report the accurate and complete information to the local foreign exchange authority, or have them recorded into the system within one month after the Circular is released, so that relevant information could be obtained in an all-round way. Any domestic institution who fails to go through registration procedures or report information will be punished by the foreign exchange authority in accordance with the Regulations of the People's Republic of China on Foreign Exchange Administration. VIII. What refinements have been made in the Circular to the management of outward remittances of the profits of domestic institutions? A: Outward remittances of the profits from direct investments should be recorded under the current account. Since the current account is convertible in China, a domestic institution only needs to follow procedures to present evidencing materials and can complete the procedures of outward remittances directly with the bank without any constraints, provided that the profits are authentic and in compliance with regulations. Pursuant to the Company Law, the Circular further clarifies that domestic institutions should make up for the losses incurred in previous years before remitting the profits overseas, and reiterates the requirement on document reviews for remitting outward the profits in the amount above the equivalent of USD 50,000 (exclusive), and does not require additional new review materials to be submitted. For the outward remittances of the profits in the amount below the equivalent of USD 50,000 (inclusive), the Circular of the SAFE on Printing and Distributing the Regulations on Foreign Exchange Administration for Trade in Services (Huifa No. 30 [2013]) shall continue to be followed, and banks may skip reviewing transaction documents in principle, but shall require domestic institutions and individuals to present transaction documents for reviews in case that the nature of funds is uncertain. Banks shall continue to refine the authenticity and compliance reviews with regard to the outward remittances of the profits of domestic institutions in accordance with the three business operation principles, which is in line with international practices. IX. What policy adjustments have been made with regard to ODI management? A: The SAFE has always been supportive to ODI that is authentic and rational. It has been committed to administration streamlining and power delegation with regard to ODI policies in recent years, shifting frequent reviews and verification to registration and filing, and adopted consistent and stable foreign exchange administration policies for ODI. Without changing the regulatory orientation for ODI, the Circular requires domestic institutions to explain to banks the sources and purposes (use plan) of the investment funds, and present to banks the resolutions of the board of directors (or of the partners), contracts and other authenticity evidencing materials, for the purposes of promoting sustained and healthy development of China's ODI to seek mutual benefits and common development through enhancing authenticity and compliance reviews. The authenticity materials could be the resolutions of the board of directors (or of the partners), contracts, or financial statements (with the sources of funds explained), and the fund use plan (with the purposes of funds described). X. What are the major considerations for managing full-scale overseas loans in domestic and foreign currencies? A: As the impact of the cross-border flows of RMB and foreign currencies on the balance of payments are the same in nature, the People's Bank of China (PBC) and the SAFE have long been committed to refining the integrated management of cross-border capital in domestic and foreign currencies. In April 2016, the PBC issued the Circular on Implementing Nationwide the Macro-prudential Management of Full-scale Cross-border Financing (Yinfa No. 132 [2016]) to roll out the pilot program of integrated management of full-scale cross-border financing in domestic and foreign currencies to financial institutions and enterprises across the country, in a bid to diversify the financing channels of domestic market players, help reduce financing cost and serve and support the development of the real economy. According to the Circular, the integrated macro-prudential management will be adopted for overseas loans in domestic and foreign currencies of domestic enterprises, which is for the purposes of building and refining the capital flow management system under the macro-prudential management framework, promoting the two-way balance of cross-border capital flows in domestic and foreign currencies, and strengthening and intensifying macro control. This Circular shall prevail in case of inconsistency between other existing provisions on foreign exchange administration and this Circular in the proportion of the owner's equity. 2017-01-26/en/2017/0126/1248.html
-
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently released the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Foreign Exchange Risk Management for Foreign Institutional Investors in the Interbank Bond Market (Huifa No. 5 [2017], "Circular"). An official from the SAFE answered media questions on relevant issues. 1. What is the main background of promulgation of the Circular? A: As the domestic bond market is liberalized, foreign institutions' participation in the domestic bond market is rising. As at the end of 2016, the foreign investors in the interbank bond market held bonds worth RMB 870 billion in total, up by RMB 83.4 billion year on year. As the two-way floating elasticity of RMB exchange rate is being strengthened, foreign investors holding RMB bonds will have the requirements for foreign exchange risk management. The foreign investors surely could manage foreign exchange risks in offshore RMB markets, but as China's foreign exchange market goes deeper, the condition will be ripe to support foreign investors to participate in China's foreign exchange market and to manage them in the bond and foreign exchange market. This Circular is released to help foreign institutional investors manage foreign exchange risks in the interbank bond market, and to boost the opening up of the bond and foreign exchange market. 2. Could you tell us what foreign institutional investors in the domestic foreign exchange market mean? Are foreign central banks and similar institutions the foreign institutional investors? A: By definition by this Circular, foreign institutional investors in the domestic foreign exchange market are the foreign investors that meet the provisions under the Announcement No. 3 of the People's Bank of China [2016], which is consistent with the scope of opening up of the interbank bond market. But foreign central banks and similar institutions are not foreign institutional investors, because they can participate in China's foreign exchange market through various channels and conveniently manage the foreign exchange risk exposure arising from the investments in interbank bond market, according to the Announcement No. 31 of the People's Bank of China [2015]. 3. What kind of foreign exchange derivatives business are foreign institutional investors allowed to engage in? A: To hedge against the foreign exchange risk exposure in the interbank bond market, foreign institutional investors could choose the RMB-foreign exchange derivatives laid out in the Detailed Rules for the Implementation of the Administration Measures for Foreign Exchange Settlement and Sales by Banks (Huifa No. 53 [2014]), including forward derivatives, foreign exchange swaps, currency swaps and options, and are subject to no restrictions on the trading categories within the existing types of derivatives in China's foreign exchange market. 4. How to understand the principle of transaction for actual requirements on foreign institutional investors in trading foreign exchange derivatives? A: This principle means that foreign institutional investors trade foreign exchange derivatives to hedge against the foreign exchange risk exposure arising from the investment in the interbank bond market with remittances from abroad. In other words, the foreign exchange risk exposure under bond investment is the basis for trading foreign exchange derivatives. Under this principle, foreign institutional investors may flexibly choose foreign exchange derivative tools and use transaction mechanisms including reverse position closing, balance settlement or gross settlement, based on the foreign exchange risk exposure of a single bond or a bond portfolio that they face. This principle is a basic requirement in the domestic foreign exchange derivatives market, inherently aligned with the prudential trading principle of the market participants. This helps maintain the order of the foreign exchange market and provides guarantees for the trading flexibility of market participants. 5. What are the policy considerations of requiring settlement agents to provide foreign exchange risk management services to foreign institutional investors? A: Settlement agents are required to provide bond investment-related services such as trading and settlement to foreign institutional investors, in accordance with the existing policy arrangements for the interbank bond market. As a result, settlement agents could provide one-stop services covering bond investment and foreign exchange trading to foreign institutional investors in handling foreign exchange derivatives business, so as to better satisfy the investment demand of foreign institutional investors. Going forward, the SAFE will diversify the trading models for foreign institutional investors to participate in China's foreign exchange market, based on the policy arrangements for the interbank bond market. 6. Could foreign institutional investors participate in China's interbank foreign exchange market? A: China's foreign change markets include the interbank market or wholesaling market, and the over-the-counter market, or retailing market or banking foreign exchange sales and settlement market. In the former market, financial institutions are responsible for providing market liquidity. Given that foreign institutional investors participate in China's foreign exchange market for the purpose of hedging against the foreign exchange risk exposure arising from investment in the interbank bond market, and are not the major providers of market liquidity at present, participating in the over-the-counter market as a client could fully satisfy their demand. Foreign institutions participating in the interbank foreign exchange market shall still follow the Announcement No. 40 of the People's Bank of China and the State Administration of Foreign Exchange [2015]. 7. What are the provisions on foreign exchange receipts and payments involved in the foreign exchange derivatives business handled by foreign institutional investors? A: Where a foreign institutional investor, when handling the foreign exchange receipts and payments involved in the derivatives business under the interbank bond market investment in accordance with the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Foreign Exchange Administration for the Investments of Foreign Institutional Investors in the Interbank Bond Market (Huifa No. 12 [2016]), goes through the procedures for outward/inward fund remittances or foreign exchange settlement or purchases through the special account for domestic and foreign currencies directly with a settlement agent, and the currencies for inward and outward remittances are the same, the SAFE will not conduct ex-ante verification or approval. 8. Is it necessary for a foreign institutional investor to sign a master agreement with the counterparty in foreign exchange derivatives trading? A: It is a universal practice in both domestic and foreign financial markets to sign a master agreement. The foreign institutional investor shall handle foreign exchange derivatives business with a settlement agent, and the two parties may select and sign a master agreement through consultation. 9. What are the considerations of the SAFE on the future development of China's foreign exchange market? A: Looking ahead, the SAFE will continue to deepen the foreign exchange market, diversify trading instruments, increase the number of participants, expand opening up and refine infrastructure to better satisfy the demands for foreign exchange risk management from market participants, domestic or overseas, including the foreign institutional investors in the interbank bond market, serve the development of the real economy and support the liberalization of the financial market. 2017-02-27/en/2017/0227/1252.html
-
To implement the gist of the 18th CPC National Congress, and the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Plenums of the 18th CPC Central Committee, and the Central Economic Work Conference, further deepen the foreign exchange administration reform, streamline administration and delegate powers, support the development of the real economy, and guard against the risks arising from cross-border capital flows, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently released the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Advancing Foreign Exchange Administration Reform to Enhance Authenticity and Compliance Reviews (Huifa No. 3 [2017], hereinafter referred to as "Circular"). The Circular is focused on coordinating facilitation and risk prevention. On the one hand, the reform will continue, with policy measures implemented in favor of the balance of foreign exchange receipts and payments to support the development of the real economy. On the other hand, efforts will be made to urge banks and enterprises to comply with the existing foreign exchange administration provisions to perform their responsibilities for authenticity and compliance reviews, to intensify statistical analysis of retained earnings overseas, refine the integrated management of cross-border funds denominated in domestic and foreign currencies and guard against risks. Authentic cross-border receipts and payments and exchanges that are in compliance with regulations will not be affected. Specifically, the Circular covers 9 measures in three aspects: I. Deepening reform to enhance the level of trade and investment facilitation. First, expanding the scope of foreign exchange settlements for domestic foreign exchange loans; second, allowing funds for overseas loans under domestic guarantees to be transferred back for domestic use. Third, increasing the share of deposits absorbed by the international foreign exchange master account with domestic banks for domestic use. Fourth, allowing overseas institutions in pilot free trade zones to go through foreign exchange settlements through the non-resident account. II. Refining management to strengthen authenticity and compliance reviews. First, further standardizing foreign exchange administration for trade in goods and requiring exporters to collect foreign exchange in time. Second, continuing to implement and refine the outward remittance management policy for foreign exchange profits from direct investment, and clarifying the requirements on documents and endorsement for the outward remittance of foreign exchange profits of the equivalent of USD 50,000 (exclusive), and that the losses of the previous years should be duly made up for before remitting profits outward. Third, making sure that any domestic institution explains to the bank the sources of investment funds and the purposes (use plan) of the funds, and present to the bank the resolutions of the board of directors (or the resolutions of the partners), contracts and other authenticity evidencing materials, when going through ODI registration and remittance procedures. III. Stepping up efforts in statistics to coordinate management of domestic and foreign currencies. First, any domestic institution who has retained overseas its export revenues or revenues from trade in services due to various reasons, but fails to undergo registration and filing procedures or submit information for the administration of foreign exchange as planned shall report relevant information to the local foreign exchange authority within one month after the Circular is released. Second, the integrated macro-prudential management of domestic and foreign currencies will be adopted for the overseas lending business of domestic institutions. In the overseas lending business of a domestic institution, the sum of the balance of overseas loans denominated in domestic currency and the balance of overseas loans denominated in foreign currencies shall not exceed 30% of its owner's equity in the audited financial statements for the previous year. The Circular will take effect as of the date of promulgation. The SAFE will regularly assess the outcomes of policy implementation and make adjustments at a proper time in line with the BOP situations. 2017-01-26/en/2017/0126/1247.html
-
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently disseminated the data on banks' sales and settlements of foreign exchange and their foreign-related receipts and payments for customers for January 2017. The SAFE press spokesperson answered media questions on relevant issues to make further clarification. Q: Could you brief us on the new changes in China's cross-border capital flows since the beginning of the year 2017. A: Since the beginning of 2017, the pressure from cross-border capital outflows facing China has been relieved remarkably. First, the deficit in banks' sales and settlements of foreign exchange has contracted. In January 2017, a deficit of USD 19.2 billion was registered under banks' sales and settlements of foreign exchange, down by 59% month on month and 65% year on year. In particular, a deficit of USD 15.6 billion was recorded under sales and settlements of foreign exchange in the non-banking sector such as enterprises and individuals, down by 64% month on month and 77% year on year. Second, a declining deficit was recorded under foreign-related receipts and payments in the non-banking sector. In January, the non-banking sector posted a deficit of USD 9.7 billion under foreign-related receipts and payments, down by 21% month on month and 83% year on year. To be specific, a surplus of USD 1.7 billion in foreign exchange receipts and payments, and a deficit of USD 11.4 billion in RMB receipts and payments were posted. The recent positive changes in the supply and demand of foreign exchange in China are multifaceted. First, market participants prefer settling foreign exchange to buying foreign exchange. In January, the ratio of customers' foreign exchange settlements with banks to the banks' foreign-related foreign exchange receipts was 62%, up by 4 percentage points month on month, while the ratio of customers' foreign exchange purchases with banks to the banks' foreign-related foreign exchange payments was 71%, down by 3 percentage points. Second, enterprises' cross-border foreign exchange financing has risen stably, and their repayment of domestic foreign exchange loans has dropped further. In January, the balance of cross-border financing for imports such as refinancing and forward L/C went up by USD 4.1 billion month on month, marking growth for the 11th consecutive month; enterprises' purchases of foreign exchange to service domestic foreign exchange loans had hit rock bottom since March 2013, down by 45% month on month. Last but not least, domestic players' demand for purchasing foreign exchange has been further stabilized. In January, for example, enterprises' purchases of foreign exchange with ODI funds dropped by 8% month on month, and with ROI, by 20% month on month; and individuals' purchases of foreign exchange under travel for trips and study abroad fell by 28% month on month. China's overall cross-border capital flows are presenting a more remarkable feature of reaching an equilibrium. Despite the many uncertainties in the external environments that are easy to trigger short-term fluctuations in global financial markets, China's middle and long-term development trends of cross-border capital flows will remain unchanged, with the economic fundamentals still serving as the fundamental support. Since the beginning of 2017, China's economy has continued to operate within a reasonable range. In January, the official manufacturing PMI remained above the boom and bust line for the 6th consecutive month, and PPI rose positively for the 5th consecutive month. Moreover, China's import and export of goods secured rapid year-on-year growth. 2017-02-17/en/2017/0217/1249.html
-
In 2016, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) received and processed 39 proposals and motions from the delegates to the NPC and the members of the CPPCC, which covered supporting enterprise going global, boosting RMB internationalization, providing financial support for the Belt and Road Initiative, RMB capital account convertibility and supporting the development of pilot FTZ. The SAFE attached great importance to the processing efforts, arranged relevant work, and made great efforts to carry out the related tasks. As a result, the processing of the relevant proposals and motions for 2016 was completed successfully, which can be attributable to the following aspects: first, close attention from the leadership and thoughtful arrangements. With the significance of the proposals and motions processing stressed by the SAFE's Party Leadership Group, the leaders in charge of this processing effort convened a special meeting to make arrangements and raise requirements for the processing. Second, improved systems and standardized processing. A special measure has been developed to make sure the processing is institutionalized and standardized. Third, good coordination and communication to enhance the processing level. The SAFE took various measures to communicate with the delegates and further listened to their opinions and suggestions to ensure the quality of the processing. Fourth, strengthened training and rigorous overseeing. Training was provided for the persons processing the proposals and motions and supervision was improved to make sure every proposal and motion was replied and every inquiry got response. After the completion of the processing, a wrap-up meeting was held to identify and summarize the experience gained and good practices in this processing effort. 2017 is a year of great importance in the 13th Five-year Plan period and a year when the supply-side structural reform will go deeper. The SAFE shall make the processing of proposals and motions from the 2017 NPC and CPPCC testimony to the implementation of the gist of the 18th CPC National Congress, the Third, Fourth, Fifth and Sixth Plenums of the 18th CPC Central Committee and the Central Economic Work Conference, and continue to improve its work styles and work hard to do well in the processing of the proposals and motions from the 2017 NPC and CPPCC, and embrace the 19th CPC National Congress with real actions. 2017-02-27/en/2017/0227/1250.html
-
To expand the opening up of the foreign exchange market and boost the liberalization of the interbank bond market, the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently released the Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Foreign Exchange Risk Management for Foreign Institutional Investors in the Interbank Bond Market (Huifa No. 5 [2017], "Circular"). The Circular mainly includes the following: Firstly, any foreign institutional investor in the interbank bond market could handle the RMB-foreign exchange derivatives business with a qualified domestic financial institution to enhance the level of opening-up of the foreign exchange market. Secondly, under the principle of transaction for actual requirements, foreign institutional investors shall carry out the foreign exchange derivatives business only for the purpose of hedging against the foreign exchange risk exposure arising from the investments in the interbank bond market with funds remitted from abroad, so as to guarantee the order of the foreign exchange market. Thirdly, diverse trading tools and mechanisms will be provided for foreign institutional investors' foreign exchange derivatives business to facilitate foreign exchange risk management. The Circular shall come into force as of the date of issuance. 2017-02-27/en/2017/0227/1251.html
-
Q: It has been recently reported that China, in order to crack down on capital flight, has introduced measures to constrain cross-border financing instruments and impact imports. What would you say about this? A: The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has not introduced recently any measures to intensify foreign exchange management with regard to import financing. For the authentic and legitimate foreign exchange receipts and payments under trade, relevant documents could be presented to a bank for direct handling. Cross-border guarantees such as overseas loans under domestic guarantees will continue to be handled in accordance with the Regulations on Foreign Exchange Administration for Cross-border Guarantees. The cross-border guarantees with authentic trade and investing backgrounds and relevant products will not be affected. 2017-01-25/en/2017/0125/1246.html
-
On January 23, 2017, Pan Gongsheng, deputy governor of the People's Bank of China and administrator of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) met with a delegation headed by Mr. Joerg Wuttke, president of the European Union Chamber of Commerce in China (EUCCC) in Beijing. The two sides exchanged ideas on the outlook for China's economic development, its cross-border capital flows and foreign exchange administration policies. According to Pan Gongsheng, China has sustained stable and healthy economic development. It was in the vanguard of the world for its GDP year-on-year growth of 6.7% in 2016, boasting fundamental factors in place that will support the equilibrium of the balance of payments in a long period to come. China has been committed to building a loose and orderly investment environment, in a bid to make its markets more transparent and standardized. Foreign exchange authorities will focus on ensuring the continuity and consistency of its foreign exchange administration policies. They will work to enhance trade and investment facilitation, ensure foreign-funded enterprises are not constrained in normal outward remittances of their profits, and support capable enterprises that meet certain conditions to engage in authentic ODI in compliance with regulations. Meanwhile, the authorities will make great efforts to intensify the authenticity and compliance reviews, with focus on preventing cross-border capital flow risks and safeguarding the health and stability of the foreign exchange markets. 2017-01-24/en/2017/0124/1245.html
-
On January 11, 2017, Pan Gongsheng, deputy governor of the People's Bank of China and administrator of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange met with Axel A. Weber, chairman of the Board of Directors of UBS AG in Beijing. The two sides exchanged views on issues such as the development of China's bond markets, flows of cross-border capital and bilateral cooperation. 2017-01-11/en/2017/0111/1243.html
-
FILE: Template on International Reserves аnd Foreign Currency Liquidity(аs аt Dec 31 2016) 2017-01-26/en/2017/0126/611.html