-
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently released the preliminary data on the balance of payments for the second quarter and the first half of 2019. SAFE spokesperson and Chief Economist Wang Chunying answered media questions on relevant issues. Q: Could you brief us on the characteristics of the balance of payments for the first half of 2019? A: In the first half of 2019, a surplus of USD 106 billion was recorded under the current account, and its ratio to GDP was 1.6%. As initially estimated, net inflows were registered under the financial account excluding reserve assets, and direct investment and portfolio investment were in surplus. Specifically, First, under the current account, trade in goods remained in surplus, trade in service recorded a shrinking deficit, and primary and secondary income were in surplus. In the BOP, trade in goods registered a surplus of USD 222.8 billion in the first half; trade in service registered a deficit of USD 129.3 billion, down by 12% year on year. Deficits were recorded under travel and transportation but went down by 8% and 14% year on year respectively; primary income registered a surplus of USD 7.1 billion, versus a deficit of USD 30.3 billion the same period last year; secondary income represented a surplus of USD 5.4 billion, compared with a deficit of USD 6.5 billion the same period last year. Second, under the financial account excluding reserve assets, direct investment and portfolio investment remained in surplus. In the first half, direct investment registered a surplus of USD 33.6 billion. In particular, ODI, at USD 46.7 billion, stayed stable; FDI, at USD 80.3 billion, remained high. Under portfolio investment, foreign investors bought additional securities of USD 50-odd billion while China bought foreign securities of extra USD 30-plus billion, and two-way equity and bond investment increased, suggesting that the two-way opening of capital market in China has fueled capital transactions and cross-border capital flows to better satisfy the demands for cross-border asset allocation among domestic and foreign investors. Currently China sees stable economic expectations, deeper opening up, and deeper trade and investment liberalization and facilitation. It is expected that during the whole year, the current account will remain within the reasonable range and likely to continue with a slight surplus; and the financial account excluding reserve assets will remain stable. All this shows that the balance of payments will remain in an equilibrium. 2019-08-09/en/2019/0809/1547.html
-
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently issued the Circular on Further Facilitating Insurance Companies in Settlement of Foreign Exchange Capital (Huifa No. 17 [2019], hereinafter referred to as Circular). The official of the SAFE has answered press questions on relevant issues. 1. Could you brief us on the background of the Circular? A: In recent years, the SAFE has been actively serving China's new pattern of all-round opening-up, deepening reform and opening up in foreign exchange, driving the reform of "delegation, administration and service”, and constantly improving the capacity and level of foreign exchange administration to serve the real economy. In March 2015, reform on insurance-related foreign exchange administration was carried out to streamline business application materials and approval procedures, and improve the efficiency of foreign exchange insurance business. With the constant expansion of opening-up and the development of financial marketization, insurance companies have raised new demands for fund facilitation of foreign exchange insurance business. On the basis of fully investigating the demands of market entities and soliciting opinions from various parties, the SAFE has further promoted administration streamlining and power delegation, improved foreign exchange administration of insurance business, made research and issued the Circular. II. What are the main contents of the Circular? A: The Circular adheres to the "principle of actual demand", cancels the approval procedure for settlement of foreign exchange capital of insurance companies, improves the fund use efficiency of insurance companies, clarifies that financial institutions operating foreign exchange business (“financial institutions”) should conduct authenticity examination of business in accordance with the "three principles of business development", and standardizes the management of foreign exchange insurance business. The main contents include: The first is to cancel the approval procedure for settlement of foreign exchange capital of insurance companies and implement the discretionary foreign exchange settlement system. An insurance company may, according to actual operating requirements, handle the settlement of foreign exchange capital and funds raised through overseas IPO with a financial institution so as to improve the fund utilization efficiency of the insurance company. The second is to allow insurance intermediaries to conduct foreign exchange settlement or purchase of indemnities under insurance-related collection and payment for clients. Financial institutions shall examine the authenticity of foreign exchange settlement or purchase. The insurance agencies and insurance brokers that meet the requirements of the competent insurance authorities may directly handle foreign exchange settlement of indemnity funds under the insurance-related collection and payment for clients with a financial institution provided that the recipient of indemnities presents a power of attorney for foreign exchange settlement, so as to improve the payout efficiency with RMB for cross-border insurance-related collection and payment for clients. The third is to improve the ongoing and ex-post regulation of insurance-related foreign exchange business. The business compliance requirements of insurance institutions such as negative issues report shall be refined to ensure the healthy development of foreign exchange insurance business. III. What is the main consideration that allows insurance intermediaries to conduct foreign exchange settlement for indemnity funds under collection and payment for clients? A: With the constant expansion of opening-up and the development of financial marketization, in the efforts of serving the Belt and Road construction, more and more insurance intermediaries, especially insurance agencies and insurance brokers, are going global to serve cross-border insurance business. In the survey of market entities, some insurance intermediaries reflect the problem in RMB payout efficiency of cross-border insurance-related collection and payment service for clients. For example, due to the sudden occurrence of maritime and marine travel business, if the insurance intermediaries are not allowed to conduct exchange settlement of indemnity funds under the insurance-related collection and payment for clients, they will not be able to directly pay RMB to the policyholders, thus affecting the timeliness of relief efforts. The relaxing of the requirement for settlement of indemnity funds under collection and payment for clients by insurance intermediaries can effectively solve this problem and better serve the Belt and Road construction. IV. What contents shall be included in the independent report of negative issues of insurance institutions according to the Circular? A: The Circular adds a new management mode for insurance institutions to actively report negative issues. The reported items of insurance companies include: no foreign exchange insurance business undertaken for two consecutive years after obtaining the license to operate foreign exchange insurance business, being taken over by the insurance regulatory authorities, committing serious violation of laws and regulations and receiving administrative penalties. The reported items of insurance agencies and brokers include having committed serious violations of laws and regulations and having received administrative penalties. Local SAFE branches may require insurance institutions, if needed, to make rectification in order to effectively guard against financial risks. 2019-06-05/en/2019/0605/1522.html
-
Q: The latest data on foreign exchange reserves disseminated by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange show that China's foreign exchange reserves as of the end of June 2019 rose by USD 18.2 billion month on month. Could you tell us why such a change occurred? What would you say about the future trends of foreign exchange reserves? A: As at the end of June 2019, China's foreign exchange reserves recorded USD 3.1192 trillion, up by USD 18.2 billion or 0.6% month on month. In June, the USD index fell and the asset price rose on the international financial market due to factors such as the global trade situations and monetary policies of central banks of major countries. Due to the combined impact of exchange rate translation and asset price changes, China’s foreign exchange reserves rose. Since the beginning of this year, despite increasing uncertainties and destabilizing factors in the external environment, China's economy has maintained overall stability and operated within a reasonable range. Supply and demand in the foreign exchange market are basically balanced, the cross-border capital flows through major channels have shown positive changes, and the foreign exchange reserves have steadily increased. Looking ahead, although the international economic and financial situations will remain complicated, China will continue to advance the high-quality economic development and actively implement the measures of opening up to the outside world in an all-around manner. The economic growth is expected to become more resilient and sustainable. All these will provide strong support for the stability of China's foreign exchange market and thus provide a solid foundation for the overall stability of the foreign exchange reserves. 2019-07-08/en/2019/0708/1536.html
-
The branches and foreign exchange administration departments of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) in all provinces, autonomous regions, and municipalities directly under the Central Government, the branches in Shenzhen, Dalian, Qingdao, Xiamen, and Ningbo, and all designated Chinese-funded foreign exchange banks, In order to facilitate the settlement of cross-border e-commerce, promote the healthy development of foreign exchange business of payment institutions and prevent risks from foreign exchange payment, the SAFE formulated the Measures for the Administration of Foreign Exchange Business of Payment Institutions (“the Measures”, please see the Appendix) based on summarizing the pilot experience of cross-border foreign exchange payment business of payment institutions. Relevant issues are notified as follows: I. Payment institutions that participated in the pilot program on cross-border foreign exchange payment business before the implementation of the Measures shall, within three months from the implementation date of the Measures, conduct directory registration with the branches and foreign exchange administration departments of the SAFE (“the SAFE branches”) at the place of registration in line with the requirements of the Measures. II. Banks may, with reference to Article 12 of the Measures, apply to provide settlement and sales of foreign exchange and relevant fund receipt and payment services to cross-border e-commerce operators and consumers who purchase goods or services by presenting electronic transaction information, provided that the banks meet the requirements on transaction information collection and authenticity verification. III. In order to ensure the smooth transition of pilot business of payment institutions on cross-border foreign exchange payment, each SAFE branch shall accurately convey the policy requirements to the payment institutions within its jurisdiction, make scientific deployment of personnel and properly perform all kinds of work for implementation of the Measures. IV. This Circular shall come into force as of the date of promulgation. In case of any inconsistency between the previous provisions and this Circular, this Circular shall prevail. The Circular of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Implementation of the Pilot Program of Cross-border Foreign Exchange Payment Business through Payment Institutions (Huifa No.7 [2015]) will be abolished. Upon receipt of this Circular, the SAFE branches should immediately forward it to the central sub-branches (sub-branches), local commercial banks, and foreign banks within their respective jurisdiction, and all designated Chinese-funded foreign exchange banks should promptly forward it to their branches. Appendix: Measures for the Administration of Foreign Exchange Business of Payment Institutions State Administration of Foreign Exchange April 29, 2019 2019-04-29/en/2019/0429/1525.html
-
The State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) has recently released the data on external debt as at the end of March 2019. The SAFE spokesperson and Chief Economist Wang Chunying answered media questions on China’s recent external debt situations. Q: Could you brief us on China's external debt for the first quarter of 2019? A: The scale of China’s external debt is basically stable. As at the end of March, the full-scale outstanding external debt (including domestic and foreign currencies) hit USD 1.9717 trillion, representing an increase of USD 6.5 billion from the end of 2018, up by 0.3%. Q: What would you say about the external debt situation in China? A: The growth of China's external debt has slowed down. Firstly, the currency structure of external debt has continued to improve. The increase of external debt in the first quarter of 2019 was mainly driven by external debt in domestic currency, which increased by 0.8 percentage point from the end of 2018. Secondly, the demand of foreign investors for purchasing domestic RMB bonds has remained stable with a slight increase. In the first quarter of 2019, the balance of debt securities increased by 4.3% from the end of 2018, accounting for 22.6% of the full-scale outstanding external debt. With the increasing uncertainties and destabilizing factors in the external environment, China's economic operation has maintained the development trend of overall stability and steady progress, showing adequate resilience. In the future, the SAFE will further refine the two-pronged "macro-prudential and micro-regulation" management framework for cross-border capital flow, and adhere to the practice of focusing on both serving the real economy and preventing risk from cross-border capital flow, so as to promote healthy economic development. 2019-06-28/en/2019/0628/1518.html
-
国家外汇管理局统计数据显示，2019年7月，银行结汇11068亿元人民币（等值1610亿美元），售汇11491亿元人民币（等值1671亿美元），结售汇逆差423亿元人民币（等值61亿美元）。其中，银行代客结汇10353亿元人民币，售汇10635亿元人民币，结售汇逆差283亿元人民币；银行自身结汇716亿元人民币，售汇856亿元人民币，结售汇逆差140亿元人民币。同期，银行代客远期结汇签约1139亿元人民币，远期售汇签约362亿元人民币，远期净结汇776亿元人民币。截至7月末，远期累计未到期结汇4473亿元人民币，未到期售汇4757亿元人民币，未到期净售汇284亿元人民币；未到期期权Delta净敞口-2265亿元人民币。 2019年1-7月，银行累计结汇71324亿元人民币（等值10493亿美元），累计售汇73995亿元人民币（等值10887亿美元），累计结售汇逆差2671亿元人民币（等值394亿美元）。其中，银行代客累计结汇66518亿元人民币，累计售汇68486亿元人民币，累计结售汇逆差1968亿元人民币；银行自身累计结汇4806亿元人民币，累计售汇5509亿元人民币，累计结售汇逆差703亿元人民币。同期，银行代客累计远期结汇签约8871亿元人民币，累计远期售汇签约2829亿元人民币，累计远期净结汇6042亿元人民币。 2019年7月，银行代客涉外收入20504亿元人民币（等值2982亿美元），对外付款20647亿元人民币（等值3003亿美元），涉外收付款逆差143亿元人民币（等值21亿美元）。 2019年1-7月，银行代客涉外收入138455亿元人民币（等值20376亿美元），对外付款136489亿元人民币（等值20084亿美元），涉外收付款顺差1966亿元人民币（等值292亿美元）。 附：名词解释和相关说明 国际收支是指我国居民与非居民间发生的一切经济交易，包括引起居民和非居民间资产和负债变化的所有金融交易和实物交易。 银行结售汇是指银行为客户及其自身办理的结汇和售汇业务，包括远期结售汇履约和期权行权数据，不包括银行间外汇市场交易数据。银行结售汇统计时点为人民币与外汇兑换行为发生时。其中，结汇是指外汇所有者将外汇卖给外汇指定银行，售汇是指外汇指定银行将外汇卖给外汇使用者。结售汇差额是结汇与售汇的轧差数。银行结售汇形成的差额将通过银行在银行间外汇市场买卖平盘，是引起我国外汇储备变化的主要来源之一，但其不等于同期外汇储备的增减额。 银行结售汇不按居民与非居民交易的原则进行统计，且其仅包括银行与客户及其自身之间发生的本外币买卖，即人民币和外汇的兑换交易，不同于国际收支交易的统计范围。 远期结售汇签约是指银行与客户协商签订远期结汇（售汇）合同，约定将来办理结汇（售汇）的外汇币种、金额、汇率和期限；到期外汇收入（支出）发生时，即按照远期结汇（售汇）合同订明的币种、金额、汇率办理结汇（售汇）。远期结售汇业务使得企业可提前锁定未来结汇或售汇的汇率，从而有效规避人民币汇率变动的风险。银行一般会通过银行间外汇市场来对冲远期结售汇业务形成的风险敞口。比如，当银行签订的远期结汇大于远期售汇时，银行一般会将同等金额的外汇提前在银行间外汇市场卖出，反之亦然。因而远期结售汇也是影响我国外汇储备变化的一个因素。 远期结售汇平仓是指客户因真实需求背景发生变更、无法履行资金交割义务，对原交易反向平盘，了结部分或全部远期头寸的行为。 远期结售汇展期是指客户因真实需求背景发生变更，调整原交易交割时间的行为。 本期末远期结售汇累计未到期额是指银行与客户签订的远期结汇和售汇合同在本期末仍未到期的余额；差额是指未到期远期结汇和售汇余额之差。签约额与累计未到期额之间的关系为：本期末远期结售汇累计未到期额=上期末远期结售汇累计未到期额+本期远期结售汇签约额-本期远期结售汇履约额-本期远期结售汇平仓额。 未到期期权Delta净敞口是指银行对客户办理的期权业务在本期末累计未到期合约所隐含的即期汇率风险敞口。银行为管理这部分风险敞口，在期权合约存续期间通常会在外汇市场进行对冲。 银行代客涉外收付款是指境内非银行居民机构和个人（统称非银行部门）通过境内银行与非居民机构和个人之间发生的收付款，不包括现钞收付和银行自身涉外收付款。具体包括：非银行部门和非居民之间通过境内银行发生的跨境收付款（包括外汇和人民币），以及非银行部门和非居民之间通过境内银行发生的境内收付款（暂不包括境内居民个人与境内非居民个人之间发生的人民币收付款），统计时点为客户在境内银行办理涉外收付款时。其中，银行代客涉外收入是指非银行部门通过境内银行从非居民收入的款项，银行代客对外支出是指非银行部门通过境内银行向非居民支付的款项。 银行代客涉外收付款是国际收支统计的组成部分，但其统计原则与国际收支采用的权责发生制原则不同，采用资金收付制原则，且其仅反映境内非银行部门与非居民之间的资金流动状况，不能反映实物交易和银行自身的涉外交易，统计范围小于国际收支统计。 2019-08-22/anhui/2019/0822/1308.html
-
常德市中心支局举办全市资本项目业务培训班 为贯彻落实资本项目外汇管理政策，提高全市资本项目外汇业务工作水平，8月30日,常德市中心支局举办了全市资本项目政策培训研讨班，辖内11家外汇指定银行的部门负责人及经办人员共计22人参加了培训会。 培训研讨会重点就资本项目外汇政策和相关业务操作知识进行了解读，培训内容主要包括资本项目基本概念与业务分类、资本项目外汇管理现状、资本项目主要政策法规、资本项目外汇业务操作指引、银行办理资本项目外汇业务等五个方面。培训中，11家外汇指定银行对各自资本业务开展情况进行了介绍发言，并采取互动模式就资本项目外汇管理重点、难点问题进行了充分讨论、沟通交流，为辖内后续拓展和规范办理资本业务打下坚实基础。 培训研讨会上传达了省局外汇管理工作会议和全市金融工作会议精神，安排部署了下半年资本项目外汇管理工作重点，提出了相关工作要求。一是加强学习，提升技能。二是要严守制度，规范履职。三是加强沟通，及时反馈。四是强化内控，防范风险。 2019-09-05/hunan/2019/0905/1121.html
-
为贯彻落实党中央国务院有关深化金融供给侧结构性改革的决策部署，坚定不移推动外汇管理改革，促进非银行金融机构外汇业务发展，日前，国家外汇管理局批准中信证券股份有限公司、华泰证券股份有限公司和招商证券股份有限公司等3家证券公司结售汇业务试点资格，允许其在风险可控的前提下开展自身及代客即期结售汇业务，并按规定参与银行间外汇市场交易。 开展证券公司结售汇业务试点，有助于促进国内证券公司本币和外币业务均衡发展，加快培育国际一流投行，推动金融业高质量发展；有助于扩大外汇市场参与主体，丰富外汇交易品种，进一步提升外汇市场的深度、广度和活跃度，完善人民币汇率市场化形成机制。 下一步，国家外汇管理局将指导试点机构稳妥有序开展结售汇业务，适时总结试点经验，研究扩大外汇市场参与主体，促进非银行金融机构外汇业务健康发展。（完） 2019-09-06/xizang/2019/0906/373.html
-
7月23日，郴州市中心支局参与指导桂阳工作站与县商务局联合举办的桂阳银星有色、拓天路桥、誉锋塑胶、龙晖制衣等9家涉外企业调研座谈暨外汇政策宣传培训，了解企业生产经营困难，现场解答外汇政策疑问。经过整理，共梳理出三个问题，一是关于代理出口与收汇问题；二是关于境外母公司融资问题；三是关于境外投资人借款问题。 为使问题及时得到解决，近期郴州市中心支局督导桂阳工作站联合银行深入上述涉外企业进行回访调查，并以书面形式将相关内容告知建设银行桂阳支行、中国银行桂阳支行，其上级行也已要求他们按照郴州市中心支局的回复意见予以办理，同时开户行主动联系了企业法人，告知企业前往银行办理业务，及时解决服务实体经济中存在的问题。 2019-09-03/hunan/2019/0903/1120.html
-
2019年7月，我国国际收支口径的国际货物和服务贸易收入16384亿元，支出14469亿元，顺差1915亿元。其中，货物贸易收入14970亿元，支出11385亿元，顺差3585亿元；服务贸易收入1414亿元，支出3084亿元，逆差1670亿元。 按美元计值，2019年7月，我国国际收支口径的国际货物和服务贸易收入2383亿美元，支出2104亿美元，顺差279亿美元。其中，货物贸易收入2177亿美元，支出1656亿美元，顺差521亿美元；服务贸易收入206亿美元，支出448亿美元，逆差243亿美元。（完） 中国国际货物和服务贸易（国际收支口径） 2019年7月 项目 按人民币计值 （亿元） 按美元计值 （亿美元） 货物和服务贸易差额 贷方 借方 1,915 279 16,384 2383 -14,469 -2104 1.货物贸易差额 贷方 借方 3,585 521 14,970 2177 -11,385 -1656 2.服务贸易差额 -1,670 -243 贷方 1,414 206 借方 -3,084 -448 2.1加工服务差额 87 13 贷方 89 13 借方 -3 0 2.2维护和维修服务差额 25 4 贷方 47 7 借方 -23 -3 2.3运输差额 -376 -55 贷方 272 39 借方 -647 -94 2.4旅行差额 -1,383 -201 贷方 189 27 借方 -1,572 -229 2.5建设差额 18 3 贷方 75 11 借方 -57 -8 2.6保险和养老金服务差额 -29 -4 贷方 28 4 借方 -57 -8 2.7金融服务差额 4 1 贷方 18 3 借方 -14 -2 2.8知识产权使用费差额 -164 -24 贷方 36 5 借方 -200 -29 2.9电信、计算机和信息服务差额 79 12 贷方 235 34 借方 -156 -23 2.10其他商业服务差额 99 14 贷方 410 60 借方 -311 -45 2.11个人、文化和娱乐服务差额 -16 -2 贷方 5 1 借方 -21 -3 2.12别处未提及的政府服务差额 -14 -2 贷方 9 1 借方 -23 -3 注： 1. 本表所称货物和服务贸易与国际收支平衡表中的货物和服务口径一致，是指居民与非居民之间发生的交易。月度数据为初步数据，可能与国际收支平衡表中的季度数据不一致。 2. 国际货物和服务贸易数据按美元编制，当月人民币计值数据由美元数据按月均人民币对美元中间价折算得到。 3. 本表计数采用四舍五入原则。 指标解释： 货物和服务贸易：是指居民与非居民之间发生的货物贸易和服务贸易交易，与国际收支平衡表的口径相同。 1．货物贸易: 指经济所有权在我国居民与非居民之间发生转移的货物交易。贷方记录货物出口，借方记录货物进口。货物账户数据主要来源于海关进出口统计，但与海关统计存在以下主要区别：一是国际收支中的货物只记录所有权发生了转移的货物（如一般贸易、进料加工贸易等贸易方式的货物），所有权未发生转移的货物（如来料加工或出料加工贸易）不纳入货物统计，而纳入服务贸易统计；二是计价方面，国际收支统计要求进出口货值均按离岸价格记录，海关出口货值为离岸价格，但进口货值为到岸价格，因此国际收支统计从海关进口货值中调出国际运保费支出，并纳入服务贸易统计；三是补充了海关未统计的转手买卖下的货物净出口数据。 2．服务贸易：包括加工服务，维护和维修服务，运输，旅行，建设，保险和养老金服务，金融服务，知识产权使用费，电信、计算机和信息服务，其他商业服务，个人、文化和娱乐服务以及别处未提及的政府服务。贷方记录提供的服务，借方记录接受的服务。 2.1加工服务：又称“对他人拥有的实物投入的制造服务”，指货物的所有权没有在所有者和加工方之间发生转移，加工方仅提供加工、装配、包装等服务，并从货物所有者处收取加工服务费用。贷方记录我国居民为非居民拥有的实物提供的加工服务。借方记录我国居民接受非居民的加工服务。 2.2维护和维修服务：指居民或非居民向对方所拥有的货物和设备（如船舶、飞机及其他运输工具）提供的维修和保养工作。贷方记录我国居民向非居民提供的维护和维修服务。借方记录我国居民接受的非居民维护和维修服务。 2.3运输：指将人和物体从一地点运送至另一地点的过程以及相关辅助和附属服务，以及邮政和邮递服务。贷方记录居民向非居民提供的国际运输、邮政快递等服务。借方记录居民接受的非居民国际运输、邮政快递等服务。 2.4旅行：指旅行者在其作为非居民的经济体旅行期间消费的物品和购买的服务。贷方记录我国居民向在我国境内停留不足一年的非居民以及停留期限不限的非居民留学人员和就医人员提供的货物和服务。借方记录我国居民境外旅行、留学或就医期间购买的非居民货物和服务。 2.5建设服务：指建筑形式的固定资产的建立、翻修、维修或扩建，工程性质的土地改良、道路、桥梁和水坝等工程建筑，相关的安装、组装、油漆、管道施工、拆迁和工程管理等，以及场地准备、测量和爆破等专项服务。贷方记录我国居民在经济领土之外提供的建设服务。借方记录我国居民在我国经济领土内接受的非居民建设服务。 2.6保险和养老金服务：指各种保险服务，以及同保险交易有关的代理商的佣金。贷方记录我国居民向非居民提供的人寿保险和年金、非人寿保险、再保险、标准化担保服务以及相关辅助服务。借方记录我国居民接受非居民的人寿保险和年金、非人寿保险、再保险、标准化担保服务以及相关辅助服务。 2.7金融服务：指金融中介和辅助服务，但不包括保险和养老金服务项目所涉及的服务。贷方记录我国居民向非居民提供的金融中介和辅助服务。借方记录我国居民接受非居民的金融中介和辅助服务。 2.8知识产权使用费：指居民和非居民之间经许可使用无形的、非生产/非金融资产和专有权以及经特许安排使用已问世的原作或原型的行为。贷方记录我国居民向非居民提供的知识产权相关服务。借方记录我国居民使用的非居民知识产权服务。 2.9电信、计算机和信息服务：指居民和非居民之间的通信服务以及与计算机数据和新闻有关的服务交易，但不包括以电话、计算机和互联网为媒介交付的商业服务。贷方记录本国居民向非居民提供的电信服务、计算机服务和信息服务。借方记录本国居民接受非居民提供的电信服务、计算机服务和信息服务。 2.10其他商业服务: 指居民和非居民之间其他类型的服务，包括研发服务，专业和管理咨询服务，技术、贸易相关等服务。贷方记录我国居民向非居民提供的其他商业服务。借方记录我国居民接受的非居民其他商业服务。 2.11个人、文化娱乐服务: 指居民和非居民之间与个人、文化和娱乐有关的服务交易，包括视听和相关服务（电影、收音机、电视节目和音乐录制品），其他个人、文化娱乐服务（健康、教育等）。贷方记录我国居民向非居民提供的相关服务。借方记录我国居民接受的非居民相关服务。 2.12别处未提及的政府服务：指在其他货物和服务类别中未包括的政府和国际组织提供和购买的各项货物和服务。贷方记录我国居民向非居民提供的别处未涵盖的货物和服务。借方记录我国居民向非居民购买的别处未涵盖的货物和服务。 2019-09-02/anhui/2019/0902/1317.html