-
近期，国际经济形势和贸易摩擦出现了一些新的情况，市场预期也随之发生了一些变化。受此影响，8月以来许多货币对美元出现了贬值，人民币汇率也受到了一定程度的影响，这个波动是市场驱动和决定的。 中 国作为一个负责任的大国，会恪守历次二十国集团领导人峰会关于汇率问题的承诺精神，坚持市场决定的汇率制度，不搞竞争性贬值，不将汇率用于竞争性目的，也 不会将汇率作为工具来应对贸易争端等外部扰动。一直以来，人民银行致力于维护人民币汇率在合理均衡水平上基本稳定，这个努力相信大家有目共睹。 当前，中国经济稳中有进，经济增速在主要经济体中位居前列，展现出了巨大的韧性、潜力和回旋余地。国际收支总体平衡，外汇储备充足，外汇市场上套期保值的企业越来越多，中国和主要发达经济体的利差处于合适区间，能够支撑人民币汇率的基本稳定。 人民银行和外汇局将保持外汇管理政策的稳定性和连续性，保障企业和个人等市场主体合理合法的用汇需求。深化外汇领域改革开放，进一步提升跨境贸易投资自由化便利化水平，服务实体经济发展和国家全面开放新格局。 无论是从中国经济的基本面看，还是从市场供求平衡看，当前的人民币汇率都处于合适水平。虽然近期受到外部不确定性因素影响，人民币汇率有所波动，但我对人民 币继续作为强势货币充满信心。人民银行完全有经验、有能力维护外汇市场平稳运行，保持人民币汇率在合理均衡水平上基本稳定。（完） 2019-08-06/henan/2019/0806/715.html
-
问：国家外汇管理局刚刚公布了最新外汇储备规模数据，请问造成2019年7月份外汇储备规模变动的原因是什么？今后的外汇储备规模趋势是怎样的？ 答：截至2019年7月末，我国外汇储备规模为31037亿美元，较年初上升310亿美元，升幅1%。 7月，我国外汇市场运行保持平稳。国际金融市场上，受全球贸易局势、主要国家央行货币政策、英国脱欧前景、地缘政治因素等影响，主要货币相对美元汇率均有所下跌，全球债券指数有所上涨。汇率折算和资产价格变化等因素综合影响外汇储备规模。 今年以来，面对全球风险挑战明显增多的复杂局面，我国经济运行延续了总体平稳、稳中有进的发展态势，主要宏观经济指标保持在合理区间。受此支撑，我国跨境资金流动保持稳定，境内外汇市场供求基本平衡，外汇储备规模月度变化属于正常波动，总体保持稳定。 往前看，国际政治经济环境依然复杂严峻，贸易保护主义和民粹主义升级，全球经济增长下行压力增强，金融市场波动性加大。但我国经济持续向好的基本面没有变，实体经济部门和金融市场韧性强、潜力大，有能力应对外部冲击，并继续推进全方位改革开放，这将为外汇储备规模保持总体稳定提供支撑。 2019-08-07/henan/2019/0807/717.html
-
日前，国家外汇管理局公布了2019年二季度及上半年国际收支平衡表初步数据。国家外汇管理局新闻发言人、总经济师王春英就相关问题回答了记者提问。 问：2019年上半年我国国际收支状况有何特点？ 答：2019年上半年，经常账户顺差1060亿美元，与国内生产总值（GDP）之比为1.6%；初步估算，非储备性质的金融账户延续净流入，直接投资和证券投资均呈现顺差。具体看： 一是经常账户中货物贸易保持顺差，服务贸易逆差收窄，初次和二次收入呈现顺差。上半年，国际收支口径的货物贸易顺差2228亿美元；服务贸易逆差1293亿美元，同比收窄12%，其中旅行和运输逆差同比分别下降8%和14%；初次收入顺差71亿美元，上年同期为逆差303亿美元；二次收入顺差54亿美元，上年同期为逆差65亿美元。 二是非储备性质的金融账户中直接投资和证券投资延续顺差。上半年，直接投资顺差336亿美元。其中，对外直接投资467亿美元，保持总体稳定；外国来华直接投资803亿美元，仍维持在较高规模。证券投资中，境外投资者增持我国证券500多亿美元，我国对外证券投资增加300多亿美元，双向投资中股票和债券均呈现增持，说明我国资本市场双向开放进一步促进了资本市场交易和跨境资本流动，更好地满足了国内外投资者跨境配置资产的需求。 当前，我国经济预期平稳，对外开放持续推进，贸易投资自由化便利化不断提升，预计全年我国经常账户仍将处于合理区间，有可能延续小幅顺差格局；非储备性质的金融账户继续平稳运行，国际收支保持基本平衡。 2019-08-16/shenzhen/2019/0816/535.html
-
近日，国家外汇管理局衡水市中心支局联合辖区外汇指定银行在饶阳县开展2019年局银联合帮扶活动外汇政策培训会暨重点企业走访活动。 培训会上，衡水市中心支局对现行货物贸易政策、汇率风险应对、全口径跨境融资审慎管理、外债管理政策及业务流程等进行了培训，并就企业日常业务办理过程中咨询较多的问题进行了现场解答。农业银行饶阳县支行讲解了国际结算业务，向与会企业推介了信用证、保函和金融保值等贸易融资产品。 饶阳县28家涉外企业业务人员，农业银行饶阳县支行、建设银行饶阳县支行相关人员参加了培训会。 2019-08-16/hebei/2019/0816/1440.html
-
近日，国家外汇管理局承德市中心支局联合承德农业银行深入滦平县伟源矿业有限责任公司开展“送进门带回家”调研活动。 此次调研活动，通过与企业负责人、财务人员座谈交流，详细深入了解了企业经营情况，发展规划、面临困难以及业务需求，并根据企业经营模式和政策需求，向企业介绍解读了跨国公司外汇集中运营、全口径跨境融资和跨境人民币政策，为企业解决当前融资困难提供了新思路。 承德市中心支局、承德农业银行相关人员参加了此次活动。 2019-08-09/hebei/2019/0809/1439.html
-
Pan Gongsheng, PBC Deputy Governor and SAFE Administrator Since 1994, especially since July 2005, China has been continuously pushing ahead with the reform of the RMB exchange rate formation mechanism. As a result, the RMB exchange rate has seen its formation and adjustment more and more marketized and its flexibility increasing. At the same time, financial institutions and market participants have become better adapted to RMB exchange rate fluctuations and adjustments, with risk hedging tools more diversified and RMB internationalization making constant progress. Although the US recently designated China as a so-called “currency manipulator”, the continuity and stability of China’s foreign exchange management policies will not be affected. Financial reform will continue to go deeper and financial opening-up will be further expanded. We will follow unswervingly, as always, the path of development with Chinese characteristics. I. The US designation of China as a so-called “currency manipulator”, essentially a political maneuver amid protectionism and unilateralism, will be remembered as a typical case of absurdity in international financial history. On August 5, in violation of common sense and professionalism in world trade and international finance, the US Treasury designated China as a “currency manipulator” for not intervening in Chinese currency devaluation. This move, in total disregard of the fact that the unilateral US tariff hikes prompted by protectionism had caused adjustment across the board on international financial markets, was also inconsistent with the conclusion of the Report on Macroeconomic and Foreign Exchange Policies of Major Trading Partners of the United States released by the US Treasury this May. It was part of the overall US strategy to trigger and escalate China-US trade frictions, fully demonstrating the lack of transparency and the arbitrariness of US policy assessment as well as the possibility that any price adjustment unwelcomed by the White House on international markets will be willfully attached a political tag of foreign government intervention. Former US Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers wrote recently that China does not fit the template for a “currency manipulator”, and that the move of the US Treasury labeling China a “currency manipulator” and asking the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to intervene was unjustified, which would surely do grave damage to the credibility of the US government and Treasury. In the newly released report on the annual Article IV consultation with China, the IMF stood by the basic judgement it had held since 2015, reiterating that the RMB exchange rate was broadly in line with China’s economic fundamentals, which is ample proof that the US accusation is groundless and untenable. The short-term adjustments lately seen in the RMB exchange rate were spontaneous reactions of financial markets to the surprise US announcements of unexpected tariffs. Since April 2018, the US has triggered and kept escalating trade frictions with China, which have become the primary influence on short-term movements of the RMB exchange rate. On June 15, 2018, while China-US trade talks were making headway, the US announced abruptly tariff hikes on USD50 billion worth of imports from China, and three days later threatened to impose higher tariffs on an additional USD200 billion of Chinese imports, sending the RMB into dramatic adjustment against the US dollar, with the onshore CNY/USD spot rate posting a monthly fall of 3.4 percent. In December 2018, as trade tensions eased after Chinese and US leaders met during the G20 summit, the RMB resumed the upward trend. In May 2019, however, the US once again raised tariffs unexpectedly on Chinese goods, bringing down the onshore CNY/USD spot rate by 2.4 percent for the month. On August 2, the US further threatened to increase tariffs on the remaining USD300 billion of Chinese goods, leading to sharp fluctuations in the RMB exchange rate. After the start of trading on August 5, the offshore and onshore RMB weakened beyond 7 per US dollar successively. For the two trading days of August 2 and August 5, the onshore CNY/USD spot rate fell by 1.9 percent approximately. All these fluctuations, as we can see, were natural market responses to external impact on the RMB. II. The politicalized and capricious policies of unilateralism and protectionism of the US will be dark clouds over global financial markets. Since 2018, US protectionist measures on trade have triggered severe turmoil in the global financial market, leading to sharp fluctuations and rapid contagion not only in stock market and foreign exchange market, but also in prices of large-category assets. After the US imposed additional 10 percent tariffs on China’s USD200 billion imports in September 2018, the global stock market (MSCI Global Index) plummeted, with the biggest drop of 18.0 percent. After the US twice escalated tariff measures against China in May and August 2019, the biggest falls in the global stock market reached 6.3 percent and 4.4 percent respectively. Gold price has appreciated by 17.0 percent since May 2019, once exceeding USD 1,500 per ounce, which also revealed a sharp rise of global risk aversion. Since April 2018, the most significant weakening of the exchange rates of emerging market currencies recorded 14.8 percent. It’s evident that the unilateralism and capriciousness of the US policies is a major source of the highly intensified shocks in the financial market. Just as Mr. Larry Summers, former US Treasury Secretary, noted that “there is significant risk of a recession since the financial crisis in 2008”. The monetary policy of the FED is critical to the stability of the global financial markets. Nevertheless, the US government continuously imposes pressures on the Fed, seriously threatening the independence and professionalism of its monetary policy. Donald Trump changed the tradition that successive U.S. presidents did not comment publicly on monetary policy, repeatedly expressing dissatisfaction with the Fed’s monetary policy and a strong dollar and even openly threatening to fire current Chairman Jerome Powell, and attempted to influence FED’s decision by nominating new board members. As the 2020 US presidential election approaches, the frequency of Trump’s public comments on the Fed and the USD exchange rate has been on the rise. Since June 2018, he has lashed out at Fed’s policies or the USD exchange rate more than 30 times. In particular, after RMB weakened beyond 7 per US dollar in early August, aside from designating China as a currency manipulator, Trump denounced Fed for its non-action, and demanded for a cut by 100 basis points as soon as possible, implicitly pointing to the issue of USD exchange rate. Recently, four former chairs of Fed have released a joint declaration, stating that although it often occurred that politicians called for looser monetary policies around elections, monetary policies based on current political (rather than economic) needs would lead to worse economic performance in the long run, which could undermine public confidence of the central bank and result in unstable financial markets. They have called for maintaining Fed’s independence, and keeping monetary-policy decisions from short-term political pressures. III. The PBC will further enhance the flexibility of RMB exchange rate in the market oriented reform, and the foreign exchange market will gradually return to the fundamentals after absorbing short-term shocks. Although the RMB exchange rate was hit by trade frictions and the US designated China as a currency manipulator, our established policies of comprehensively deepening reforms and further opening up will not waver. We will continue to implement the managed floating exchange rate regime based on market supply and demand with reference to a basket of currencies, persistently push forward market oriented exchange rate reform, and improve the RMB exchange rate formation mechanism, so as to keep the exchange rate basically stable at a reasonable and equilibrium level. As a responsible big country, China adopted a responsible attitude during the Asian financial crisis and global financial crisis, and made significant contributions to the gradual post-crisis recovery of the world economy. We will remain firmly committed to the previous G20 summits’ commitments including non-adoption of competitive devaluation and no use of the exchange rate as a tool to cope with international trade disputes. The resilience and potential of the Chinese economy provide a solid base for the stability of RMB exchange rate. Despite that the RMB exchange rate will be subject to trade frictions and other external shocks, we judge it will not depreciate in disorder, and the foreign exchange market will eventually return to fundamentals after a brief shock. Firstly, economic performance has been stable and is expected to firm going forward. The fundamentals for sound economic growth over the long term remain unchanged as economic growth is expected to outpace most major economies and the RMB remains a strong currency. According to Bank for International Settlements, from 2005 to June 2019, RMB appreciated by 38 percent in tems of nominal effective exchange rate, and 47 percent in terms of real effective exchange rate, topping all other G20 countries. Though there have been huge uncertainties in recent China-US trade frictions, the marginal effect of US tariffs on China has been declining. Since the beginning of 2019, with favorable fundamentals, the Chinese economy has on the whole maintained stability while making steady progress, and the major macroeconomic indicators have performed within a reasonable range. Achievements have been made in economic structural adjustments, with growth resilience enhanced and macro leverage ratio remaining basically stable. Secondly, cross-border capital flows are generally stable. As China gradually expanded areas of opening up and comprehensively implemented the management model of pre-establishment national treatment plus a negative list, the domestic business environment has been further improved and foreign direct investment still enjoys great development potential. In recent years, China has continuously promoted high-level opening up of the financial market, and created a favorable policy environment for foreign investors, including those from the US, to allocate more resources to RMB assets. So far, the sizes of Chinese bond market and stock market have been ranking high in the world, but only around 2 percent and 3 percent of the financial assets were held by foreign investors. With Chinese bond market and stock market more widely included in major international indices, given the relatively high yield in the Chinese bond market against the expansion of negative interest rates worldwide, there is still great potential for foreign investment. Thirdly, China’s external debt has been more stable. In recent years, China’s external debt growth is not high compared with its economic size. By end-2018, China’s external debt ratio (outstanding external debts/GDP), debt ratio (outstanding external debts/annual export proceeds in foreign exchange) and debt servicing ratio (external debt principal and interest repayment/annual export proceeds in foreign exchange) stood at 14.4 percent, 74.1 percent and 5.5 percent respectively, far lower than the internationally accepted alarm level. The structure of external debt continued to optimize, as foreign central bank investors continued to increase their holdings of Chinese bonds for medium- to long-term asset allocation. As a result, the proportion of debt securities in outstanding external debt increased continuously from 8 percent at end-2014 to 22 percent at end-2018. Such kind of capital is relatively stable, hence unlikely to be “deleveraged” in times of exchange rate changes. Fourthly, the RMB exchange rate showed more two-way fluctuations, and foreign exchange market entities became more adaptive and rational. Since the “8.11” exchange rate reform, the RMB exchange rate has been more flexible, with its fluctuation ratio approaching that of currencies of major developed economies. The two-way fluctuations of the RMB exchange rate have become regular, and the depreciation pressure has been timely released. At present, individual foreign currency purchases have been more stable, outbound direct investment by enterprises has been more reasonable and orderly, foreign currency stockpiling has been gradually disappearing, and enterprises’ awareness of exchange rate risk management has been further enhanced. IV. The PBC will maintain the continuity and stability of foreign exchange administrative policies, continuously enhance the liberalization and facilitation of cross-border trade and investment, and improve the cross-border capital flow management framework for opening-up at a higher level. The foreign exchange authorities will maintain policy continuity and stability to serve the new pattern of China’s comprehensive opening-up. We will implement the decisions and arrangements of the CPC Central Committee and the State Council, and fulfill our responsibilities by seizing the long-term trend while respecting market forces. We will firmly adhere to our commitments to reform and ensure supply of foreign currencies to enterprises and individuals with regular demands, thus supporting import and export, profit distribution, two-way cross-border investment and other production and operation activities of enterprises, as well as meeting individuals’ actual demands of travelling and studying abroad. Current account payments arising from our people’s real needs will remain unaffected. In addition, we will continue to vigorously promote the liberalization and facilitation of cross-border trade and investment, and further carry out pilot facilitation reforms including trade receipt and payment facilitation, electronization of tax filing for trade in services, and delegation of external debt cancellation to banks, with a view to better serve the real economy. We will continue to deepen the reform of “streamlining administration, delegating powers, strengthening regulation and improving services”, optimize the online system of “Internet Plus government services” released by the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE) in June, and foster a more open, fair and convenient business environment. We firmly believe that in the future, China’s foreign exchange administration will adapt to the opening-up in a more open environment; capital account opening-up, two-way opening-up of the financial market and the RMB internationalization will be promoted in a coordinated way at a higher level; and the liberalization and facilitation of cross-border trade and investment will be further advanced. We have the confidence and capability to effectively prevent risks arising out of external shocks, maintain stability of the foreign exchange market, and promote stable and sound development of the financial market and the financial system. (Source: China Financial News) 2019-08-12/en/2019/0812/1545.html
-
问：境外公司给境内个人佣金，能入账吗？ 答：如果是经营性的活动，一般应入个人结算账户。同时经常项目项下小额、零星的经营性收入结汇，可以凭有效身份证件在个人年度便利化额度内通过个人储蓄账户办理。 2019-08-19/hainan/2019/0819/1001.html
-
国家外汇管理局统计数据显示，2019年7月，银行结汇11068亿元人民币（等值1610亿美元），售汇11491亿元人民币（等值1671亿美元），结售汇逆差423亿元人民币（等值61亿美元）。其中，银行代客结汇10353亿元人民币，售汇10635亿元人民币，结售汇逆差283亿元人民币；银行自身结汇716亿元人民币，售汇856亿元人民币，结售汇逆差140亿元人民币。同期，银行代客远期结汇签约1139亿元人民币，远期售汇签约362亿元人民币，远期净结汇776亿元人民币。截至7月末，远期累计未到期结汇4473亿元人民币，未到期售汇4757亿元人民币，未到期净售汇284亿元人民币；未到期期权Delta净敞口-2265亿元人民币。 2019年1-7月，银行累计结汇71324亿元人民币（等值10493亿美元），累计售汇73995亿元人民币（等值10887亿美元），累计结售汇逆差2671亿元人民币（等值394亿美元）。其中，银行代客累计结汇66518亿元人民币，累计售汇68486亿元人民币，累计结售汇逆差1968亿元人民币；银行自身累计结汇4806亿元人民币，累计售汇5509亿元人民币，累计结售汇逆差703亿元人民币。同期，银行代客累计远期结汇签约8871亿元人民币，累计远期售汇签约2829亿元人民币，累计远期净结汇6042亿元人民币。 2019年7月，银行代客涉外收入20504亿元人民币（等值2982亿美元），对外付款20647亿元人民币（等值3003亿美元），涉外收付款逆差143亿元人民币（等值21亿美元）。 2019年1-7月，银行代客涉外收入138455亿元人民币（等值20376亿美元），对外付款136489亿元人民币（等值20084亿美元），涉外收付款顺差1966亿元人民币（等值292亿美元）。 附：名词解释和相关说明 国际收支是指我国居民与非居民间发生的一切经济交易，包括引起居民和非居民间资产和负债变化的所有金融交易和实物交易。 银行结售汇是指银行为客户及其自身办理的结汇和售汇业务，包括远期结售汇履约和期权行权数据，不包括银行间外汇市场交易数据。银行结售汇统计时点为人民币与外汇兑换行为发生时。其中，结汇是指外汇所有者将外汇卖给外汇指定银行，售汇是指外汇指定银行将外汇卖给外汇使用者。结售汇差额是结汇与售汇的轧差数。银行结售汇形成的差额将通过银行在银行间外汇市场买卖平盘，是引起我国外汇储备变化的主要来源之一，但其不等于同期外汇储备的增减额。 银行结售汇不按居民与非居民交易的原则进行统计，且其仅包括银行与客户及其自身之间发生的本外币买卖，即人民币和外汇的兑换交易，不同于国际收支交易的统计范围。 远期结售汇签约是指银行与客户协商签订远期结汇（售汇）合同，约定将来办理结汇（售汇）的外汇币种、金额、汇率和期限；到期外汇收入（支出）发生时，即按照远期结汇（售汇）合同订明的币种、金额、汇率办理结汇（售汇）。远期结售汇业务使得企业可提前锁定未来结汇或售汇的汇率，从而有效规避人民币汇率变动的风险。银行一般会通过银行间外汇市场来对冲远期结售汇业务形成的风险敞口。比如，当银行签订的远期结汇大于远期售汇时，银行一般会将同等金额的外汇提前在银行间外汇市场卖出，反之亦然。因而远期结售汇也是影响我国外汇储备变化的一个因素。 远期结售汇平仓是指客户因真实需求背景发生变更、无法履行资金交割义务，对原交易反向平盘，了结部分或全部远期头寸的行为。 远期结售汇展期是指客户因真实需求背景发生变更，调整原交易交割时间的行为。 本期末远期结售汇累计未到期额是指银行与客户签订的远期结汇和售汇合同在本期末仍未到期的余额；差额是指未到期远期结汇和售汇余额之差。签约额与累计未到期额之间的关系为：本期末远期结售汇累计未到期额=上期末远期结售汇累计未到期额+本期远期结售汇签约额-本期远期结售汇履约额-本期远期结售汇平仓额。 未到期期权Delta净敞口是指银行对客户办理的期权业务在本期末累计未到期合约所隐含的即期汇率风险敞口。银行为管理这部分风险敞口，在期权合约存续期间通常会在外汇市场进行对冲。 银行代客涉外收付款是指境内非银行居民机构和个人（统称非银行部门）通过境内银行与非居民机构和个人之间发生的收付款，不包括现钞收付和银行自身涉外收付款。具体包括：非银行部门和非居民之间通过境内银行发生的跨境收付款（包括外汇和人民币），以及非银行部门和非居民之间通过境内银行发生的境内收付款（暂不包括境内居民个人与境内非居民个人之间发生的人民币收付款），统计时点为客户在境内银行办理涉外收付款时。其中，银行代客涉外收入是指非银行部门通过境内银行从非居民收入的款项，银行代客对外支出是指非银行部门通过境内银行向非居民支付的款项。 银行代客涉外收付款是国际收支统计的组成部分，但其统计原则与国际收支采用的权责发生制原则不同，采用资金收付制原则，且其仅反映境内非银行部门与非居民之间的资金流动状况，不能反映实物交易和银行自身的涉外交易，统计范围小于国际收支统计。 2019-08-19/safe/2019/0819/13882.html
-
日前，国家外汇管理局公布了2019年7月份银行结售汇和银行代客涉外收付款数据。国家外汇管理局新闻发言人、总经济师王春英就2019年7月份外汇收支形势回答了记者提问。 问：2019年7月份我国外汇收支形势有何特点？近期有什么变化？ 答：7月银行结售汇和涉外收支更趋平衡，外汇市场运行保持稳定。一是银行结售汇逆差明显收窄。7月，银行结售汇逆差61亿美元，环比减少68%。综合考虑远期结售汇和期权交易等其他供求因素，外汇市场供求基本平衡。二是非银行部门涉外收支基本平衡。7月，企业、个人等非银行部门涉外收支小幅逆差21亿美元，6月为逆差91亿美元。 外汇市场预期平稳，主要渠道的跨境资金流动状况稳中向好。一方面，市场主体结汇意愿上升、购汇意愿减弱。7月，衡量结汇意愿的结汇率，也就是客户向银行卖出外汇与客户涉外外汇收入之比为67%，环比上升5个百分点；衡量购汇意愿的售汇率，也就是客户从银行买汇与客户涉外外汇支出之比为69%，环比下降1个百分点。另一方面，企业货物贸易、直接投资等项下跨境资金持续净流入且有所增加，个人购汇更加平稳。7月，货物贸易涉外收支和结售汇顺差均环比扩大，直接投资、证券投资涉外收支和结售汇呈现稳定规模的顺差，个人购汇同比下降8%。 8月以来我国外汇市场秩序保持良好。8月初，美国超预期宣布关税措施，全球金融市场反应剧烈，人民币汇率也出现短期调整。从我国企业、个人等市场主体的涉外交易看，8月以来银行结售汇呈现小幅顺差，跨境收支保持基本平衡。这充分体现了国内经济基本面对外汇市场稳定的支撑作用，说明我国外汇市场更加成熟理性，可以更好地吸收、适应外部环境变化。我们将继续保持外汇管理政策的连续性、稳定性，不断提高跨境贸易投资自由化便利化水平，进一步夯实外汇市场平稳运行的基础，服务实体经济发展和国家全面对外开放新格局。 2019-08-19/safe/2019/0819/13881.html
-
2019年二季度，境外投资者对我国境内金融机构直接投资流入315.63亿元，流出214.28亿元，净流入101.34亿元；我国境内金融机构对境外直接投资流出338.61亿元，流入263.52亿元，净流出75.08亿元（见表1）。 按美元计值，2019年二季度，境外投资者对我国境内金融机构直接投资流入46.32亿美元，流出31.45亿美元，净流入14.87亿美元；我国境内金融机构对境外直接投资流出49.69亿美元，流入38.68亿美元，净流出11.02亿美元（见表2）。 表1：金融机构直接投资流量表（季度） 单位：亿元 项目 2019年二季度 来华直接投资净流动 101.34 流入 315.63 流出 214.28 对外直接投资净流动 -75.08 流入 263.52 流出 338.61 注： 1.本表计数采用四舍五入原则。 2. 季度流量人民币值通过当季流量美元值折算而成，折算率采用人民币对美元中间价季度平均值。 3.净流动为流入减流出差额，正值代表净流入，负值代表净流出。 表2：金融机构直接投资流量表（季度） 单位：亿美元 项目 2019年二季度 来华直接投资净流动 14.87 流入 46.32 流出 31.45 对外直接投资净流动 -11.02 流入 38.68 流出 49.69 注：1.本表计数采用四舍五入原则。 2.净流动为流入减流出差额，正值代表净流入，负值代表净流出。 附：名词解释 金融机构包括在我国境内依法成立的从事银行业、证券业、保险业及其他金融业务的机构总部及分支机构。 金融机构直接投资是指境外投资者对我国境内金融机构或我国境内金融机构对境外企业进行股权或债权投资，且相关股权投资使直接投资者在直接投资企业中拥有10%或以上的表决权。 金融机构直接投资流量表统计境内金融机构对外直接投资和来华直接投资的股权或债权投资流量数据情况（不含收益再投资）。其中：来华直接投资流入是指境外投资者对我国境内金融机构投入或新增的股权或债权投资，流出是指境外投资者从我国境内金融机构减少或撤出的股权或债权投资；对外直接投资资金流出是指我国境内金融机构对境外企业投入或新增的股权或债权投资，流入是指我国境内金融机构从境外企业减少或撤出的股权或债权投资。 2019-08-19/shenzhen/2019/0819/536.html