-
为贯彻落实好党中央、国务院关于稳外贸稳外资的各项工作部署，及时了解中韩（盐城）产业园企业对外汇管理工作的满意程度，准确掌握企业相关意见建议及政策诉求，6月19日下午，盐城市分局联合盐城经济技术开发区管委会举办中韩（盐城）产业园企业座谈会暨外汇政策宣讲会。盐城市分局副局长耿耿、盐城经济技术开发区副主任董玲玲、中韩（盐城）产业园近40家企业代表参加此次会议。 会上，盐城市分局就汇率避险管理、跨境贸易投融资高水平开放试点等政策进行宣讲解读。会议现场气氛活跃，宣讲人员现场解答参会企业提出的业务问题，耿耿副局长对外汇政策要点及管理导向进行提示总结。 下一步，盐城市分局将继续推动外汇政策宣讲工作，进一步畅通外汇政策传导渠道，有效提升外汇管理服务实体经济水平，助力盐城开放型经济高质量发展。 2025-06-26/jiangsu/2025/0626/1090.html
-
2024年中国国际收支报告 2025-03-29/chongqing/2025/0329/3195.html
-
2025-06-23https://www.gov.cn/yaowen/liebiao/202506/content_7028797.htm
-
为持续深化金融服务实体经济质效，便利涉外企业办理外汇衍生品业务，宜宾市分局积极推进跨境金融服务平台企业汇率风险管理服务场景应用，通过打破“银企”信息壁垒，构建“线上申请、数据共享、高效审核”新模式，切实解决了中小微外贸企业办理汇率避险业务“流程繁、材料多、耗时长”的痛点，以科技创新驱动外汇服务提质增效。 一是统筹安排，靠前部署。结合辖内实际，宜宾市分局认真选取试点银行，下发业务操作手册，督促银行提前制定试点方案，熟悉业务流程，做好技术支持准备，为试点落地提供坚实保障。二是凝聚“政银”合力，做好试点工作。宜宾市分局扎实做好试点银行系统权限开通、业务指导工作，及时解决银行ba用户密码遗忘等问题，要求银行严格录入业务信息，确保数据的及时性、准确性和完整性，为跨境金融服务平台数据共享共用奠定基础。三是稳妥推进试点业务落地。宜宾市分局督导银行围绕涉外企业差异化需求，提供定制化、精准化服务方案。试点首周，指导辖内中国工商银行运用企业汇率风险管理服务场景为2家企业办理远期结售汇业务2笔。 下一步，宜宾市分局将秉持“外汇惠民”宗旨，聚焦企业诉求，推动跨境金融服务平台“企业汇率风险管理服务”场景应用扩面增效。 2025-06-16/sichuan/2025/0616/2965.html
-
日前，国家外汇管理局公布了2025年5月银行结售汇和银行代客涉外收付款数据。国家外汇管理局副局长、新闻发言人李斌就2025年5月外汇市场形势回答了记者提问。 问：2025年5月我国外汇市场形势如何？ 答：5月份，境内外汇供求总体平衡，外汇市场运行平稳。一是跨境资金延续净流入。5月份企业、个人等非银行部门跨境资金净流入330亿美元。其中，货物贸易资金净流入保持在较高水平，外资增持境内股票较上月进一步增加，服务贸易、外商投资企业分红派息、对外直接投资等资金净流出总体保持稳定。二是市场预期平稳。5月份银行结售汇转为顺差。企业、个人等结汇意愿稳定，购汇需求回落，市场交易理性有序。当前我国经济保持总体平稳、稳中有进发展态势，将继续为外汇市场稳健运行提供有力支撑。 2025-06-26/heilongjiang/2025/0626/2654.html
-
跨境金融服务平台企业汇率风险管理服务场景开展试点以来，眉山市分局积极响应总局优化企业汇率风险管理服务、推进跨境金融服务平台应用的相关工作要求，组织金融机构通过调研走访、集中宣讲、线上沟通等方式广泛开展汇率风险中性理念宣传，引导企业关注汇率走势、通过套期保值增强风险应对能力。 根据前期摸排的企业清单，眉山市分局了解到辖内某化工企业有衍生品交易业务需求后，迅速指导银行上门为该企业办理汇率避险业务，并在跨境金融服务平台进行登记，成功落地辖内首笔跨境金融服务平台汇率风险管理服务应用场景试点业务。该笔业务的成功办理不仅帮助企业有效规避了汇率风险，也大幅缩短了业务受理和审核时限。 下一步，眉山市分局将继续指导银行机构做好企业汇率风险管理服务，积极推动跨境金融服务平台应用场景运用，切实为眉山市涉外经济发展保驾护航。 2025-06-17/sichuan/2025/0617/2966.html
-
俄罗斯莫斯科市政府发布消息表示，2025年第一季度，莫斯科对中国的非原料型产品出口同比增长了近30%。数据表明，出口增长最快的是消费品、轻工业产品和食品，增幅分别达13倍、3.5倍和1倍。2024年，莫斯科对中国的高科技产品出口增长近36%，其在对中国非原料型产品出口份额中占72%。(文章来源：俄新社) 2025-06-25/heilongjiang/2025/0625/2651.html
-
6月12日，鹤岗市分局召开推进边民互市贸易工作座谈会，萝北县商务局、金融机构负责人及工作人员共计14人参加会议。会议围绕“推动萝北县边民互市贸易高质量健康稳定发展”主题进行充分研讨，外汇局工作人员解读了相关政策，就如何用好用足边民互市贸易支持政策，充分释放政策红利提出了工作建议。 2025-06-26/heilongjiang/2025/0626/2645.html
-
6月9日，鹤岗市分局到辖内某公司开展调研，全面了解企业经营状况，聚焦企业外汇政策与服务诉求，提出有针对性的意见建议，同时深入解读跨境融资、外债便利化、汇率风险管理等外汇政策，使企业更加全面深入了解外汇政策，提升融资便利度，助力企业稳健经营发展。 2025-06-25/heilongjiang/2025/0625/2644.html
-
Distinguished Party Secretary Chen Jining, Former PBOC Governor Zhou Xiaochuan, Mayor Gong Zheng, Deputy Director Wang Jiang, Minister Li Yunze, Chairman Wu Qing, Vice Minister Hu Haifeng, Administrator Zhu Hexin, and dear guests, Good morning! I would like to thank Shanghai Municipal Committee of the CPC and Shanghai Municipal People’s Government, especially Party Secretary Chen Jining and Mayor Gong Zheng. Thank you for your care and support for the financial work and the People’s Bank of China (PBOC). It is a great honor for me to be the co-chairperson of this year’s Lujiazui Forum. After years of efforts, the Forum has grown into a communication platform with significant global influence and wide market reach. On behalf of the PBOC and other hosts, I would like to express warm welcome and sincere gratitude to everyone. At last year’s Forum, I discussed China’s monetary policy stance and the evolution of monetary policy framework down the road. Over the past year, the PBOC has adopted an accommodative monetary policy stance and rolled out multiple monetary policy measures. The aggregate and structural policy tools have effectively supported the sustained economic recovery and financial market stability. At the same time, we have improved the monetary policy framework, optimized the intermediate monetary policy variables, cultivated policy rates, enhanced monetary policy transmission efficiency, diversified monetary policy toolkit, and strengthened policy communication and expectation guidance. The transformation of monetary policy framework is a gradual and ongoing process, and we will continue to conduct assessments and make refinements in the future. Now, I would like to share with you my observations on global financial governance. This is a very broad topic. So I will focus on four issues: international monetary system, cross-border payment system, global financial stability system, and the governance of international financial organizations. I. On the International Monetary System Throughout history, the international monetary system has never stopped evolving. The replacement of global dominant currencies reflects the profound change in the international landscape and the iteration of national competitiveness. In the 17th century, the Dutch Guilder became the early international currency. From the late 18th century to the first half of the 20th century, the British pound was the dominant currency globally. After the World War II, the U.S. dollar established its dominance and has retained its status up till now. As a global public good, the international currency, if dominated by the sovereign currency of a single country, has inherent instabilities. First, a sovereign currency issuer tends to prioritize its own interests over the supply of global public goods when its own interests conflict with the attribute as a global public good. Second, fiscal and financial regulatory issues of a sovereign currency issuer and the accumulation of structural problems in its domestic economy may generate financial risks with spillover effects, or even escalate into a global financial crisis. Third, in times of geopolitical tensions, national security concerns, or even wars, the global dominant currency tends to be instrumentalized or weaponized. The above problems have driven growing global discussions on the reform of international monetary system. Over the past decade, the driving forces behind the shifts in the international monetary system stemmed primarily from the economic and financial dimensions in the wake of the global financial crisis, and hence the discussions were centered on economic and financial developments. The discussions this time around, however, are mainly driven by geopolitical issues. Broadly speaking, there are two lines of argument. The first one is on how to weaken the excessive reliance on a single sovereign currency and its negative impacts, foster healthy competition among a few strong sovereign currencies, and put in place incentive-restraint mechanisms. A multipolar international monetary system can prompt sovereign currency issuers to strengthen policy constraints, enhance the resilience of international monetary system, and more effectively safeguard global economic and financial stability. Madam Lagarde, President of the European Central Bank (ECB), noted in her recent speech that the global order based on multilateral cooperation is fracturing, with uncertainty about the dominant role of the U.S. dollar, and the changing landscape could open the door for the euro to play a greater international role. Over the past two decades, the evolution of international monetary system had two key features. The first was the creation of the euro in 1999. The euro now accounts for around 20 percent of global foreign exchange reserves, second only to the U.S. dollar. The second was the steady rise of the RMB’s international status after the global financial crisis in 2008. The RMB has already become the world’s second largest trade finance currency. Calculated on a comprehensive basis, the RMB has become the world’s third largest payment currency. Besides, the weight of the RMB in the International Monetary Fund’s Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) currency basket ranks third. Going forward, the international monetary system is likely to continue its evolution towards a system where a few sovereign currencies coexist and compete with checks and balances. Be it a single sovereign currency or a small group of sovereign currencies serving as the global dominant currency, the sovereign currency issuers should assume their responsibilities by strengthening domestic fiscal discipline and financial regulation, and advancing the structural reform of the economy. The second line of argument is on a super-sovereign currency serving as the global dominant currency, and discussions have been largely focused on SDRs. Dr. Zhou Xiaochuan, former governor of the PBOC, once raised this issue in 2009. Theoretically, SDRs can effectively overcome the inherent problems of a single sovereign currency as the global dominant currency. It offers greater stability in currency value and is better positioned to function as a global public good, as it can help manage global liquidity and facilitate crisis response. The SDR has the attributes of a super-sovereign currency. Having said that, we still lack political consensus and will globally, if the SDR were to become a global dominant currency. Moreover, insufficient market scale, depth and liquidity have limited the role of SDRs. Turning SDRs into a global dominant currency requires member countries to build political consensus, which is not easy, given the current international landscape. Optimizing operational arrangements is also needed to gradually expand the usage of SDRs. In terms of allocation and issuance mechanisms, the International Monetary Fund (IMF) issues SDRs mainly as part of crisis response and mostly in the form of a large one-off allocation. In the future, the IMF can issue SDRs regularly and expand the size of issuance. Regarding the scope of use, we need to encourage private sector and market entities to use SDRs in international trade, investment and financing, and to issue SDR-denominated bonds. We need to enhance the role of SDRs as a reserve asset, and establish the SDR settlement mechanism adaptable to large-scale usage. II. On the Cross-Border Payment System The cross-border payment system serves as the artery of global funds flow. It is a keystone for facilitating international trade, investment and financing, and for safeguarding financial stability. It is also a vital pillar of the international monetary system. The evolution of the international monetary system towards coexistence of a few sovereign currencies and booming digital technologies will promote the diversification of the cross-border payment system, which will, in turn, accelerate the shifts in the international monetary system. In recent years, problems faced by the traditional cross-border payment system have loomed large. First, there is a generational differences between traditional cross-border payments and emerging digital technologies. Problems of low efficiency, high costs, and poor penetration demand urgent resolution. Second, cross-border payments require coordination among different legal and regulatory frameworks, as well as among different stakeholders. Therefore, we need to enhance international cooperation. G20 and other international organizations attach great importance to promoting cross-border payments, and formulated a roadmap to enhance cross-border payments. Third, the geopolitical rivalry has escalated. The traditional cross-border payment infrastructures can be easily politicized, weaponized, and used as unilateral sanction instruments, thus undermining the international economic and financial order. Against this background, there have been growing calls for improving the cross-border payment system. New payment infrastructures and settlement methods are continuously emerging, driving the global cross-border payment system onto a more efficient, secure, inclusive and diverse trajectory. This trend will continue to strengthen. First, the cross-border payment system has become more diversified. In terms of currency usage, an increasing number of countries and regions are using local currencies for settlement, promoting the international use of a broader range of currencies. Cross-border payments dominated by a single sovereign currency are undergoing gradual changes. As for payment channels, the rise of new cross-border payment systems and regional multilateral payment systems, along with the traditional correspondent bank model, has diversified settlement channels and further improved the efficiency of cross-border payments. After over a decade of construction and development, China has basically established a cross-border RMB payment and clearing network featuring multiple channels and wide coverage. Second, the interoperability of payment systems and payment ecosystems continues to improve. More countries and regions have extended the operating hours of their payment systems, adopted internationally standardized messaging formats, and promoted the interconnection of fast payment systems. These efforts have enhanced the efficiency of cross-border payments and reduced transaction costs. Countries and regions exemplified by Asia have made substantial progress in enhancing the interoperability of retail payment ecosystems through the interconnection of QR code payments, greatly facilitating cross-border payments by their residents. Third, new technologies are used in cross-border payments at a faster pace. Underpinned by new technologies such as blockchain and distributed ledger, central bank digital currencies and stablecoins are thriving, making possible the simultaneous processing of payment and settlement. The development has fundamentally reshaped the traditional payment landscape, and significantly shortened the cross-border payment chain. It, however, has also posed great challenges to financial regulation. Technologies, such as smart contracts and decentralized finance, will further promote the evolution and development of cross-border payment systems. III. On the Global Financial Stability System Before the 2008 financial crisis, the international community mainly relied on IMF, which is at the center of the Global Financial Safety Net (GFSN), for crisis response during and after crisis. After the 2008 financial crisis, ex ante prevention mechanisms such as financial regulatory rules were further strengthened. On the one hand, the multi-layer financial safety net has continued to improve. I gave a speech on strengthening the financial safety net at the Boao Forum for Asia in March last year. At the global level, in recent years, the IMF has continuously enhanced its crisis response capabilities in times of crisis, strengthened its policy surveillance functions, and expanded the scope of policy surveillance. At the regional level, the European Financial Stability Facility, the Latin American Reserve Fund, the Chiang Mai Initiative in Asia, and the Arab Monetary Fund have been established successively, serving as important supports for financial stability in their respective regions. At the bilateral level, central banks in the major advanced economies such as the U.S. Federal Reserve and the ECB have injected liquidity into the markets during crisis through currency swap arrangements. The local currency swap cooperation among emerging markets has also progressed steadily. The PBOC has signed bilateral currency swap agreements with central banks or monetary authorities in over 30 countries and regions. These swap arrangements have become an important part of the GFSN. On the other hand, the crisis prevention system based on regulatory rules has been continuously refined. After the 2008 global financial crisis, the international community overhauled the global financial regulatory system through a number of major reforms, including issuing Basel III, enhancing the robustness of banking institutions, and strengthening the supervision of systemically important financial institutions (SIFIs). China has been actively involved in the formulation and implementation of international regulatory standards, and is one of the few economies that have fully implemented Basel III. China has developed a regulatory framework for SIFIs, and its systemically important banks have all met the total loss-absorbing capacity (TLAC) requirements. China has put in place a deposit insurance scheme capable of providing full protection for more than 99 percent of depositors. It has also issued and fully implemented regulations on asset management, which has significantly reduced the risk of shadow banking. Currently, the global financial stability system is faced with some new challenges. First, the regulatory framework remains fragmented. There is even a propensity to “race to the bottom”. In recent years, due to domestic political headwinds, some countries have wavered in their implementation of international regulatory rules, such as Basel III. It may lead to regulatory arbitrage, and undermine global financial stability system. The international community should proactively implement the agreed regulatory reform measures, thereby preventing regulatory arbitrage and cross-border transmission of risks. Second, the regulation on emerging areas, such as digital finance, remains insufficient. For example, global regulatory coordination is incommensurate with the quick-expanding crypto asset market, and coordination on climate risk-related regulatory framework is yet to be improved. Regulatory stance swings widely, and is highly prone to political influence. A harmonized regulatory standard on the adoption of artificial intelligence in the financial sector is also absent. The international community needs to strengthen coordination and bridge the gaps in regulation. Third, the regulation on non-bank intermediaries remains lax. In the past two decades, the weight of non-bank intermediaries in global financing has risen significantly. Funding through non-bank intermediaries is relatively unstable and less transparent, yet the leverage is rising, which calls for enhanced regulation. We believe that the key path to crisis prevention and resolution is to establish a diversified and efficient GFSN with a powerful IMF at its core, and to ensure the consistency and authority of global financial regulatory rules. This is also the path that we must follow through. IV. On the Governance of International Financial Organizations After the World War II, starting with the founding of the IMF and the World Bank, the international community gradually built up a multi-tiered and multi-dimensional system of international financial organizations, covering areas such as international policy coordination, financial regulatory rule-making, and multilateral development. These organizations have become major platforms for international financial governance, and they play an important role in promoting global economic and trade growth as well as safeguarding global financial stability. While global economic landscape keeps changing, quotas and voting power haven’t seen any material adjustments for a long time in major international financial organizations, such as the IMF and the World Bank, as well as in some regional financial organizations. As a result, emerging markets and developing countries are significantly underrepresented, and this is incommensurate with their actual weight in the global economy. Moreover, the international community should also be well aware of the fact that a few member countries pursue unilateralism, and they have meddled in the governance and operation of international financial organizations. International financial organizations need to keep pace with the times and advance governance reforms to reflect in time the relative positions of member countries in the global economy and enhance the voice and representativeness of emerging markets and developing countries. International financial organizations should safeguard and practice true multilateralism, and improve governance efficiency. Among all the international financial organizations, the IMF is at the core, and it plays a vital role in global economic and financial governance. The IMF is a quota-based international financial organization. The size of quotas determines the IMF’s crisis response capacity in crisis, while quota shares determine member countries’ voting power in the IMF and the amount of financing they have access to. The current quota shares can not reflect the relative positions of member countries in the global economy. An immediate quota share realignment in line with the consensus reached is crucial for the IMF to improve governance and enhance its legitimacy and representativeness. The global economy is now facing heightened uncertainty. While improving their governance structures, major international financial organizations should further reinforce their roles in economic surveillance. They should assess objectively the risks facing the world and individual countries, and offer guidance to member countries to cement their support for economic globalization and the multilateral trading system. They should also strengthen policy guidance for member countries and enhance macroeconomic policy coordination to keep the international financial system stable. Dear guests, Improving global financial governance requires more frequent dialogues and stronger cooperation among all parties. Staying committed to reform and opening-up and upholding a path of multilateralism, we will work actively to play a constructive role in helping foster a global financial governance system that is more equitable, fair, inclusive, and resilient. To conclude, I wish the Forum a full success. Thank you. 2025-06-18/en/2025/0618/2309.html