Hu Kaihong:
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to the press conference of the State Council Information Office. Mr. Guan Tao, director of the BOP Department of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange (SAFE), will unveil the data on foreign exchange receipts and payments for 2014 and take your questions. Now let us welcome our old friend Mr. Guan.
January 22, 2015 09:39:37
Guan Tao:
Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Welcome to today's press conference. I’m very glad to meetthe friends from the press again. If I remember correctly, it has been a year since the SAFE's first press conference on the data on foreign exchange receipts and payments on January 24 last year. Please allow me to extend my heartfelt thanks to you for your vigorous support to the SAFE’s press release effortsduring the past year. Now I am going to unveil the data on the foreign exchange receipts and payments for 2014 and take your questions on behalf of the SAFE.
The year 2014 is the first year of China’s efforts to deepen its reforms in an all-round way. During the year, the international environmentremainedcomplex and volatile, the world economy was still under deep adjustments, the monetary policies of themajor economies were differentiated to some extent, and the international financial market experiencedsharper fluctuations; while the domestic economyran within a reasonable range, economic restructuring witnessed positive changes, and the reform and opening up made significant progress. The SAFE actively adaptedto the new normal of economic development, and energetically promoted administrationstreamlining and power delegation, reform and innovation. Overall, China's cross-border capital flows in 2014 were basically balanced amid oscillations.
January 22, 2015 09:51:36
Guan Tao:
Banks settled foreign exchange of RMB 11.64 trillion (USD 1.90 trillion) and sold foreign exchange of RMB 10.87 trillion (USD 1.77 trillion) in 2014, with a surplus of RMB 768.6 billion (USD 125.8billion). Meanwhile, according to the data on foreign-related receipts and payments through banks, banks registered cumulative foreign-related income of RMB 20.39 trillion (USD 3.32 trillion) and made external payments of RMB 20.14 trillion (USD 3.28 trillion) on behalf of clients, with a surplus of RMB 247.9 billion (USD 40.5 billion)
China’s foreign exchange receipts and payments in 2014 show the following characteristics:
First, the situation of massive cross-border capital inflows was significantly improved. In the first half of the year, after adjustments for foreign exchange rate factors (the same below), the foreign exchange settled by banks was up 1% year on year and the foreign exchange sold by banks was up 10% year on year, representing andecrease in the surplus of 53%. Meanwhile, the foreign-related income received via banks was up 12% year on year, and external payments made through banks were up 18% year on year, representing a decrease in the surplus of 79%.
Second, market players were less willing to settle foreign exchange but more motivated to purchase it. As a measure of the willingness of companies and individuals to settle foreign exchange, foreign exchange settlement through banks as a percentage offoreign-related foreign exchange income (i.e., foreign exchange settlement rate) declinedfrom 77% in Q1 to 68% in Q2 and Q3 and then rebounded slightly to 71% in Q4, representing an annual average of 71%, which was 1 percentage point lower than that in the previous year; foreign exchange sales through banks as a percentage offoreign-related foreign exchange payments (i.e., foreign exchange sales rate) that measures the motivation to buy foreign exchange registered a quarter-on-quarter increase from 61% in Q1 to 73% in Q4 with a year-round average of 69%, and the foreign exchange sales rate gained 6 percentage points over last year.
January 22, 2015 09:54:49
Guan Tao:
Third, the bidirectional fluctuations of cross-border capital became more evident. The surplus in foreign exchange settled and sold by banks stood at USD 159.2 billion in Q1, dropped to USD 29 billion in Q2, and became a deficit of USD 16 billion in Q3, which further decreased to USD 46.5 billion in Q4. According to the data of foreign-related receipts and payments through banks, there was a surplus of USD45.5 billion and USD40.7 billionin Q1 and Q2 but a deficit of USD20 billion and USD25.7 billion in Q3 and Q4.
Fourth, the forward settlement and sales of foreign exchange of banks were more balanced. In 2014, the surplus of contracts for forward settlement and sales of foreign exchange reached USD56.1 billion, 58%lower than the year earlier. Specifically, in the first two months, the monthly surplus of contracts for forward settlement and sales of foreign exchange averaged USD24 billion, a continuation of the high level since the end of 2013. But after March, market expectations for the RMB exchange rate were differentiated and contracts for forward settlement and sales of foreign exchange recorded surpluses and deficits alternatively, and the monthly average surplus from March to December amounted to USD800 million.
Fifth, the foreign exchange market realized autonomous balance. In 2014, the balance of spot and forward foreign exchange settled and sold by banks (or the balance of foreign exchange settled and sold by banks and the balance of the combined undue net forward foreign exchangesettled), an indicator of the supply and demand for foreign exchange in the retail market, amounted to a surplus of USD 85.6 billion, down by 74% from 2013. Specifically, thebalance registered a surplus of USD 164.9 billion in the Q1 and of USD 2.5 billion in Q2, and then a deficit of USD 30.5 and USD 51.3 billion in Q3 and Q4 respectively.
These are the major statistics I want to disclose regarding the foreign exchange receipts and payments in2014. You can also find the relevant data released on the SAFE's official website.
Now I would like to take questions you might have.
January 22, 2015 09:59:05
Hu Kaihong:
Thank you, Mr. Guan. Now please raise your questions and remember to tell us where you are from before asking your questions.
January 22, 2015 10:02:49
Journalist from CCTV:
My question is: Since the second half of 2014, China’s import and export trade has maintained a large surplus but the foreign exchangesettled and sold by banks has posted a persistent deficit starting from August, what are the primary reasons? Does it imply the outflow of “hot money” and what is the future trend? Another question is about European debts as the European Central Bank (ECB) will decide today if a massive stimulus package will be introduced to purchase European debts. Some European countries cut their interest rates recently, which was called the “European QE” by the market. What impact will thishave on the cross-border capital flows in China and on the RMB exchange rate? Thank you.
January 22, 2015 10:03:10
Guan Tao:
Thank you for your questions. Your questions cover two aspects: first, the foreign exchange situation of last year and its future development; second, the influences of the European QE on China.
We have noticed that the trade surplus has been widening since the second quarter of last year, while the balance of foreign exchange settled and sold via banks has been on a decline and even swung from surplus to deficit. Thisquestion was raised repeatedly at the last two press conferences. We call this the deviation of trade surplus from the supply-demand relationship of foreign exchange. In the second half of last year, the surplus of import-export trade added up to USD277.8 billion, an increase of 66% over the first half. But meanwhile, spot and forward settlement and sales of foreign exchange witnessed a persistent deficit, with the accumulated balance transferring from a surplus of USD167.4 billion in H1 to a deficit of USD81.8 billion. From the perspective of balance of payments, the surplusunder the currentaccount reached USD72.2 billion in Q3, a significant rise from the quarterly average of USD40.2 billion in H1. However, cross-border capital flows turned from the quarterly average net inflow of USD38.9 billion in H1 to net outflow of USD9 billion in Q3.In the meantime, cross-border capital inflows changed from a quarterly average increase of USD74.3 billion in H1 to a decrease of USD400 million. It is preliminarily estimated the balance of payments in Q4 may resume the trend of “currentaccount is in surplus and capitalaccount is in deficit”.
January 22, 2015 10:06:36
Guan Tao:
China’s cross-border capital flows became more volatile for three main reasons: first, the floating band of the RMB against the USD was further widened in March 2014, the bidirectional fluctuations in foreign exchange gradually enjoyed popular support, and the expectations for the RMB exchange rate were differentiated, and as a result, enterprises were less willing to settle but more motivated to purchase foreign exchange, and conducted financial operations such as increasing foreign exchange deposits and reducing foreign exchange loans. At the end of 2014, the ratio between domestic foreign exchange loans and domestic foreign exchange deposits dropped 26 percentage points from the start of the year, and the operation of covering short dollar positions appeared in the financial operation strategy of the market.
Second, in 2014, the world economy showed signs of an imbalanced slow recovery.The Federal Reserve gradually exited its quantitative easing monetary policy and the USD exchange rate was strengthened across the board with a rise of 12% in the dollar index for the whole year. Under this circumstance, substantial international capital flowed back to the US, putting many emerging markets under the pressure of capital flight and domestic currency devaluation. China was one of the affected.
Third, since China’s economic development entered a “new normal” stage, market players have paid more and more attention to Chineseeconomic operations as well as the underlying risks and problems, indicating the market mood is being fluctuating. Besides, the RMB exchange rate has been close to a balanced and reasonable level and widelyaccepted and recognized by the market, thus inspiringdomestic market players to adjust the currency structure of their assets and liabilities.
January 22, 2015 10:17:25
Guan Tao:
As for how to view this bidirectionalvibration in cross-border capital, there are two key points:
On the one hand, it is in line with the directions of macro control and reform. First, with the advancement of the market-oriented reform in the RMB exchange rate formation mechanism, the People’s Bank of China (PBC) has gradually relaxed its normal intervention in the foreign exchange market, and the pattern of “trade surplus and capital outflow” will inevitably be more normalized. Second, banks’ foreign exchange deposits have increased but domestic foreign exchange loans have decreased, which indicates that most foreign exchange deposits have been used by banks for overseas investments. Therefore, foreign exchange is dispersedly held by the market instead of being collectively held by the PBC in the past, which is a process of “making foreign exchange held by the people”. Third, domesticenterprises are accelerating their repayment of large amounts of dollar-denominated debts taken on in the early stage, which will help lowerthe leverage rate of the whole society and reduce currency mismatch. It is an expected and orderly adjustment.
On the other hand, the current adjustment is moderate and tolerable. Although China faced certain pressure of capital outflows in H2 of 2014, the basic pattern of foreign exchange supply exceeding demand and increasing foreign exchange reservesremained unchanged for the whole year. Moreover, the market was running smoothly, corporate demand for foreign exchange was basically guaranteed, the liquidity of the foreign exchange market was abundant, and there was no panic stockpiling of foreign exchange by enterprises or individuals. In November and December, the gap between foreign exchange demand and supply was narrowed from USD20-30 billion two months ago to around USD 10 billion.
January 22, 2015 10:29:20
Guan Tao:
Furthermore, the bilateral RMB/USD exchange rate had a slight fall, but the the RMB exchange rates against currencies of major trade partners remained strong. Last year, the RMB nominal and real effective exchange rate indexes compiled by theBank for International Settlements hit new record highs with an annual appreciation of 6.4%and 6.2% respectively, and both of them have appreciated by 40.5% and 51%, respectively since the exchange rate reform in 2005.
In the future, China’s cross-border capital flows will still face many uncertainties and instabilities. But it is certain that China will maintain a surplus under the current account, especially a surplus in trade in goods; China’s economic growth will remain at a high level in the world despite the shift from high speed to medium-to-high speed, and the RMB exchange rate will remain higher than those of major currencies, which can help maintain its attractiveness to international capital, particularly medium- and long-term capital. From the uncertain aspects, market players will continue to keep an eye on domestic economic operations and the financial risks involved, and the diminishinginterest rate spreads between domestic and foreign currencies will speed up the restructuring of asset and liability currencies of market players. There are many global uncertainties as well. For example, the monetary policies of major economies will be further differentiated, the US monetary policy will be normalized, and the quantitative easing monetary policies in Europe and Japan will continue to be intensified, in addition to the price adjustment of bulk commodities, currency turmoil in emerging markets, and geopolitical disputes. Overall, China’s balance of payments will maintain the structure of “a basic currentaccount balance and bidirectional fluctuations in cross-bordercapital flows” in the near future.
January 22, 2015 10:50:41
Guan Tao:
Now I would like to answer your second question, the influences of the European QE on China. Since the euro zone is a major economy and the euro is a main currency in the world, its macroeconomic policies have enormous spill-over effect which we have been paying close attentionto. It now appears that the QE which might be introduced in the eurozone will exert both positive and negative influences on China. For one thing, as the US monetary policy is being normalized, the European QE can somehowease the restrictive influence of the US QE tapering. For another, the differentiation of the monetary policy trends inleading economies will affect theexchange rates between major currencies, which will aggravate the volatility of the international financial market, especially the foreign exchange market, and increase the difficultyin managing cross-border capital flows and exchange rate expectations by emerging markets. What’s more, the European QE is only one of the important external factors influencing cross-border capital flows and the RMB exchange rate of China and otherfactors shall be considered to make an integrated analysis, a holistic judgment and relevant plans. Thank you.
January 22, 201511:04:25
Journalist from the Xinhua News Agency:
Good morning, Mr. Guan, you mentioned just now that the monetary policies of the world’s major economies were differentiated, and would be further aggravated. We know that the US Federal Reserve exitedits quantitative easing policy last year and it is widely expected that the interest-rate rise cycle will be initiated earlier or later than the middle of this year. If the Fed initiates theinterest-rate rise cycle, what impact will it have on China’s future cross-border capital flows? How do you make the judgment? What measures shall we take? Thank you.
January 22, 2015 11:12:29
Guan Tao:
Thank you for your question. Relevant questions were raised three times in the four press conferences last year. Each move in macroeconomic policy of the United States, the world’s largest economy and major reserve currency issuer, will create huge spillover effect,and the Fed's introduction or tapering of the QE monetary policy has drawn wide concerns from us. Currently our judgments are as follows: first, the Fed’s exit from QE had limited impact on China’s cross-border capital flows last year. TheFed’s gradual tapering of QE in 2014 exposed many emerging economies to pressure from capital outflows and currency devaluation. In China, amid the much sharper bidirectional fluctuationsof the RMB exchange ratesince the second half of 2014, the Fed’s tapering of QE, intertwined with the appreciation of the US dollar and other factors, boostedChinese enterprises to quicken their financial adjustment and posed a certain outflow pressure on cross-border capital. However, this did not fundamentally change the general landscape of a basic equilibrium in the balance of payments and foreign exchange supply and demand and a slight increase in foreign exchange reserves in the year, and China's foreign exchange market was basicallystable, with strong exchange rates of the RMB against other currencies, despite slight adjustment in the exchange rate of the RMB against the USD.
Second, the continued normalization of the Fed’s monetary policy this year will pose both challenges and opportunities to China’s cross-border capital flows. I remember answering a similar question at the press conference of last January. At that time, we pointed out that we had the confidence and ability to cope with the influence of the Fed’s QE tapering. On the one hand, China’s economy has generally maintainedsteady and rapid growth with robust external accounts, abundant foreign exchange reserves and a high tolerance for the impact on cross-border capital flows. On the other hand, the Fed’s QE exit and monetary policy normalization are based on the prospects of the US economic recovery. If the US economy is well recovered, it means China’s external demand is improved, which is conducive to export expansion. These favorable conditions still exist at present. Meanwhile, we shall also convert the pressure from normalized US monetary policy to our motivation for further reform and openingup and acceleration of the building of a new open economic system. For instance, the normalization of US monetary policy may differentiate expectationsof the RMB exchange rate, which is favorable forthereformof the market-oriented formation mechanism of the RMB exchange rate and may accelerate the restructuring of asset and liability currencies of domestic enterprises. But as a correction of the early large-scale inflows, this can promote China’s balance of payments to a basic equilibrium and help improve macrocontrol.
January 22, 2015 11:14:22
Guan Tao:
It was specially emphasized at theCentral Economic Work Conference in late 2014 that, in face of the new characteristics of openingup, we should more actively foster a balance between domestic and external demand, between imports and exports and between introducing foreign capital and “going global”, to gradually realize a basic equilibrium in the balance of payments, which therefore remains a current target of macro control. The normalization of US monetary policy may propel domestic enterprises to accelerate debt adjustment, which helps reduce currency mismatch and the external vulnerability of China’s economy. The key point is that China should first put its own house in order,so as to respond to the impacts from external uncertainties and instabilities.
Hence, attaching equal importance toreform promotion and risk prevention remains as the priority of foreign exchangeadministration this year: first, proceed with administration streamlining and power delegation in foreign exchange administration; second, keep improving trade and investment facilitation with focus on promotingthe convertibility of the capital accounts; third, enhance the two-way monitoring and early warning of cross-border capital flows, activelybuild a macro-prudential management system for external debts and capital flows, and step up efforts to investigate and punishillegalities and violations regarding cross-border capital flows; fourth, positively cultivate the foreign exchange market to better serve the needs of the real economicdevelopment; and fifth, innovate the application of foreign exchange reserves and keep improving the operation and management of foreign exchange reserves. Thank you.
January 22, 2015 11:37:36
Journalist from the Economic Daily:
Market institutions recently said that the net errors in China's balance of payments have hit USD300 billion in recent years, which possibly reflects secret capital outflows. Especially in the third quarter of last year,net errors and omissions set a record of USD-63 billion. What would you say about it, Mr. Guan? Thank you.
January 22, 2015 11:47:12
Guan Tao:
Thank you for your question. We have noticed this too. Ever since 2009, the “net errors and omissions” in the balance of payments of China has been negative with an aggregate value of USD346.3 billion in Q3 of 2014, when the currentaccount surplus was USD72.2 billion, capitalaccount deficit USD9 billion, reserve assets USD100 million less, and net errors &omission USD-63.2 billion. I would like to answer this question in four aspects:
First, statistically speaking, the size of China’s net errors and omissions is moderate and the balance of payments statistics are reliable. Givenstatistical techniques, all countries have set the netting item of “net errors and omissions” when preparing the balance of payments statement to equalize debit and credit amounts. And as the balance of payments expands, the net errors and omissions may increase, and the errors in high-frequency data are probably larger than those of low-frequency data. For example, quarterly data may be more volatile than half-year data, which is then more fluctuating than annual data. According to international practice, the balance statement is reliable provided that the size of “net errors and omissions” accounts for less than 5%, positively or negatively, of the total export-import volume of trade in goods under the balance of payments in the same period. Since the international financial crisis in 2008, China’s net errors and omissions have accounted for about 2% of the total export-import volume of trade in goods, with 5.6% in Q3 of 2014 and only 2.4% in the first three quarters. According to the balance of payments statement of Q2 of 2014 just released by the US, the currentaccount deficit reached USD103.5 billion, the capitalaccount surplus was USD10.3 billion, the reserve assets was up by USD800 million, and net errors &omissions stood at USD94 billion, taking up 9% of the total export-import volume of trade in goods in the same period, compared with 15% in Q1 of 2012.
January 22, 2015 11:48:04
Guan Tao:
Second, whether they were recessive or dominant capital outflows, China’s current account surplus and capital accountdeficit in Q3 of last year were “to be expected”. At present, the PBC has gradually relaxed the normal intervention in the foreign exchange market, so “trade surplus and capital outflow” are an inevitable market result, which is reflected as “currentaccount surplus and capital accountdeficit” in the balance of payments statement. However, it is in line with the direction of control and reform and is a desirable balance of payments structure. In theory, there is an analytical framework which incorporates “net errors and omissions” into the capital account.
Third, we need to pay close attention to cross-border capital flows that violate the laws or regulations, but should not overanalyze the economic implications of “net errors and omissions”. For example, the net errors and omissions in Q3 of last year amounted to USD-63.2 billion. There might be two statistical reasons for it – underestimated capital export or overestimated current account surplus, so it could not be simply concluded as the reason of capital flows. Indeed, the direction of net errors and omissions is not necessarily connected with that of capital flows. Since 2009, China’s net errors and omissions have been negative, but by 2013 our country had been under the pressure of capital inflow and appreciation of the RMB except 2012 when it was under an outflow pressure. From the angle of statistical techniques, if a reasonable and stable method is adopted, the specific scale of the two possibilities can be estimated and shall also be included in the corresponding trading items under the balance of payments statement. For instance, one of thediscrepancies between the imports & exports of trade in goods in BOP statement and theCustoms’ imports & exports statistics is because the BOPstatement will record the imports & exports of smuggled goods confiscated by the Customs under the item of trade in goods. If this method is accepted, the illegal capital flows shall be registered under the related trading items. Statistics are only an objective reflection of economic activities, not a tool to manage capital flows. We should monitor and analyze the illegal cross-border capital flows, without focusing on net errors and omissions.
January 22, 2015 11:58:57
Guan Tao:
Fourth, as data quality is the lifeline of statistics, the quality of balance of payments statistics shall be further improved. In face ofnew conditions and problems, the SAFE will continue to improve the statistical system and methodology to reduce net errors and emissions. For example, the recently implemented external financial assets and liabilities and trade statistical systemdistinguishes the trade changes in externalinvestments and non-trade changes such as currency conversion, namely, the changes in external investments caused by trade and the changes in external assets caused by currency conversion. After they are distinguished, the data quality of foreign investment statistics can be enhanced. This system also collects the overseas consumption statistics via bank cards, which can be used to estimate the statistics of Chinese residents' overseas travelspending more accurately. Besides, in addition to continuing to collect transaction-by-transaction data through enterprise declaration, more sampling surveys and estimations will be conducted to ensure the comprehensiveness and accuracy of statistics at a lower cost and in a more reliable way. Thank you.
January 22, 2015 12:14:59
Journalist from China Economic Times:
Hello, Mr. Guan, you mentionedjust now that China’s cross-border capital inflows slowed down and bidirectional fluctuationsbecame more frequent in 2014. In the capital market, was there any new change to cross-border capital inflows and outflows after the Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect was launched? What influences do you think will the Stock Connect have on the future cross-border capital inflows and outflows? Thank you.
January 22, 2015 12:23:02
Guan Tao:
Thank you for your questions. The Shanghai-Hong Kong Stock Connect was officiallylaunchedon November 17, 2014 as a major reform initiative to expand the two-way opening up of capital markets and facilitate the orderly flows of the RMB between Mainland China and Hong Kong.Since its official launch, the system has run smoothly, with theevaluation from relevant authorities meeting expectations. The balance of payments statistics show that in November and December, the northbound trading saw net inflows of capitalthat totaled USD11.4 billion, while the southbound trading saw net outflows of USD1.5 billion. After netting between northbound and southbound funds, the net inflows into the mainland stock market under the Stock Connect stood at USD9.8 billion, but only took a limited share of the overall cross-border capital flows in the same period, and also took a low proportion as compared with thefunds flowing in the same period into the stock market through a variety of legitimate channels, in terms of net capital inflows into the stock market. Therefore, even though the northbound funds were considerable and played a certain role, they were small-scale and at the initial stage.
Second,China hasmade clear its intention to make the RMB convertible under the capital account at an earlier date and to expand the two-way opening up of capital markets, which represents thegeneral trend. After the markets are opened, cross-border capital fluctuations are likely to be more frequent. Given this, we shall first be more tolerant and well-prepared for capital outflows and inflows withmeasures, and second, we shall put our own house in order, which is the key for coping with the impact of cross-border capital flows after the openingup. China's steady economic growth will be beneficial to the inflows of long-term capital; if the reform is advanced successfully, some price distortions can be removed; and if a macro-prudential system and mechanism is established for the management of cross-border capital flows, we can deal with the impact from cross-border capital flows. In other words, we would better respond to the new situation of growing convertibility and further opening up of the market in the future if we are more tolerant and handle our internal affairs well. Thank you.
January 22, 2015 12:24:55
Journalist from China Review News Agency in Hong Kong:
Hello, Mr. Guan, I’d like to know the developments of London and Paris as emerging offshore RMB settlement centers, and their cooperative and competitive relationships with Hong Kong. Thank you.
January 22, 2015 12:38:57
Guan Tao:
This is a good question, but it has nothing to do with the theme of today's press conference. Thank you.
January 22, 2015 12:39:37
Journalist from the Xinhua News Agency:
I'm wonderingabout the monitoring of hot money in 2014. At the Davos Forum, Zhou Xiaochuan, governor of PBC, notedyesterday that hot moneywas still affecting the prices of bulkcommodities and the stock market of our country, so I want to learn about the SAFE’s monitoring and supervision in this regard in 2014.
2015-01-22 12:40:06
Guan Tao:
Last year the foreign exchange administrationdepartments were closely monitored the inflows and outflows of cross-border capital based on the concept of balanced management. An overalljudgment was made on the situation of cross-border capital flows in thebeginning of the year, the monitoring focuswas adjusted in line with the changing situation in the middle of the year, and the situation of 2015 was forecasted and analyzed at the end of the year.Weproducedperiodic reports on the influences of cross-border capital flows on the stock and bulk commodity markets. Take the influences on the bulk commodity market for example. In early 2014, some domesticenterprises conducted carry trade with bulk commodities, but this arbitrage motivation faded away starting from the second quarter along with the significant intensification of bidirectional fluctuations of the RMB exchange rate and the drastic adjustments to the prices of international bulk commodities. In June in particular, risky events of trade finance took place in some places, which was a significant lesson for the market on risks. We noted that some regulators had tightened their regulatorypolicies, domestic banks had stepped up the authenticity verification of trade finance of bulkcommodities, and some overseas banks had reducedtheirChinese business for fear of possible risks, resulting in tremendous changes to the relevant financing activities in H2 of the year. Based on the trade finance data we monitored, the balance of cross-border trade finance for imports rose by USD42.8 billion in H1 but fell by USD87.7 billion in H2. This was not necessarily the financing under bulk commodities, but it mirrored a certain trend. Thank you.
January 22, 2015 12:41:05
Hu Kaihong:
This is the end of today's press conference. Thank you, Mr. Guan, and thank you all.
January 22, 2015 12:51:37
(The original text is available at www.china.com.cn)
